Menu
homeWord

Qualcomm snapdragon processor is better than mediatek. Rating of mobile processors - which chip is better


A real race has broken out between manufacturers in the smartphone market. In 2018, the reality is that sales mobile devices significantly ahead of laptops. In this regard, it would be logical to analyze the best processors for smartphones.

But first, let's clarify, because saying “processor” in the case of smartphones is not entirely correct. Phones and tablets are currently based on SoC (System-on-a-Chip) system. It is a crystal containing various modules: computing unit, graphics core, communication components (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc.), RAM and much more.

Go and buy new processor It won’t work for your smartphone, if only because they are not on sale. It is also worth considering that the same SoC can work differently on different smartphones, so we were based on test results from popular Western sources and benchmark tests and prepared the top 10 best processors in terms of performance at the end of 2018.

Top 10 best processors for smartphones

Note! All prices are indicated for smartphone models equipped with the processors listed below.

10 Helio X30

Deca-core processor
Country: China
Average price: 17,240 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.3

The first ten-core mobile system became one of the most powerful in 2017. The X30 ranks 10th in terms of performance among the best processors for 2018. This was facilitated by a new technical process measuring 10 nanometers. Compared to the previous generation, the “stone” has become 35% more productive and 50% more energy efficient. There are three clusters on the board. The first one has two cores Cortex-A73 with a frequency of up to 2.5 GHz. The second consists of four Cortex-A53 cores with a frequency of up to 2.2 GHz, and the youngest has four Cortex-A35 cores with a rate of 1.9 GHz. The GPU is PowerVR 7XTP-MP4 with a frequency of 800 MHz. The solution is capable of decoding 10-bit 4K2K video with HDR10 support.

A peculiar novelty was the introduction new technology control of processor cores called CorePilot 4.0. It can save up to 25% more energy than version 3.0. Intelligent system task scheduling together with the UX Monitoring system and SystemPowerAllocator (SPA) power management helps the architecture perform well in resource-intensive tasks.

9 Snapdragon 710

Budget processor from Qualcomm
Country: China
Average price: RUB 27,766.
Rating (2018): 4.4

The 710 model is an intermediate link between the top-end 800 series and more budget models. It combines flagship capabilities in the field of photography, video shooting and provides the use of good artificial intelligence for the most optimal price. In addition, autonomy has increased due to improved production technology.

This stone is the heir to the best mid-budget mobile processor Snapdragon 660, released in 2016. The system has eight Kryo 360 cores on the chip, based on architecture from ARM. Four cores with the index A-75 operate at a frequency of 2.2 GHz, another four - A-55 produce a frequency of 1.7 GHz. In fact, there are cores from Snapdragon 845 here, but they have lower frequencies in accordance with their category. The Adreno 616 is responsible for graphics output, and it is assisted by the Spectra 250 image processor, which supports dual 20-megapixel cameras.

8 Kirin 970

Technological breakthrough from Huawei
Country: China
Average price: RUB 27,990.
Rating (2018): 4.4

Single-chip system Kirin 970 was a real revelation from Huawei. A separate neuromorphic processor with its own single-chip system is designed to solve the highest-intensity tasks in neural networks, for computer vision and pattern recognition systems. The processor NPU provides up to 25 times faster performance than similar systems and 50 times better energy efficiency. Thus, performance increases and heat dissipation decreases. Besides, Huawei was given access to the internal filling of the NPU block, which will allow developers of third-party applications to optimize their products for this hardware.

Additionally, it is worth highlighting the presence of a dual signal processor, which allows for motion capture and face detection. These functions include four-level hybrid autofocus and improved shooting of moving objects in low light.

7 SNAPDRAGON 835

People's favorite
Country: China
Average price: RUB 30,790.
Rating (2018): 4.6

This processor is installed on notorious mobile smartphones Samsung Galaxy S8 and One Plus 5. But unlike Exynos, this model can be easily found on large quantities other Android smartphones, most of which are more affordable than the Korean ones.

In terms of performance, there are 8 cores (4 cores operating at 2.45 GHz and 4 cores at 1.9 GHz) and a good graphics accelerator - Adreno 540. Performance in synthetic tests is comparable to Exynos, the difference is about 7%, however, when everyday use you'll hardly notice the difference.

Advantages:

  • Excellent performance
  • Widespread on sale
  • Low cost

6 Exynos 8895

Power at an affordable price
Country: Vietnam
Average price: RUB 35,489.
Rating (2018): 4.6

The basis for flagship smartphones, technological know-how from Samsung - this is how this processor can be characterized. Its frequency can reach 3 GHz, and the model itself will be the first in the Samsung lineup to be made using a 10-nanometer process technology. 8 cores will be responsible for performance, working effectively in both single-core and multi-core modes.

Power consumption is extremely low and is only 5 W. It also has the ability to record 4K video at 120fps, which is four times faster than its competitor - the Snapdragon 835 is limited to 4K video at 30fps. One of the disadvantages is the performance limitation due to support for DirectX 11. Despite this, the stone supports Vulkan 1.0. Data transfer is also limited to dual-band 802.11 Wi-Fi. Thus, smartphones with this mobile processor will be an excellent option for video recording enthusiasts.

5 Snapdragon 845

Powerful and most common processor
Country: China
Average price: RUB 21,490.
Rating (2018): 4.7

This processor uses universal computing cores own production, and not the reference one from ARM. New process technology with index 10 nm LPP FinFET , allows for greater performance gains compared to 10 nm LPE FinFET. The best combination of mass production, performance and cost made the processor the most popular among manufacturers.

It inherited the same eight-core architecture from the 835 model. The configuration here consists of 4 energy-efficient cores with a frequency of up to 1.8 GHz for performing simple tasks and 4 high-performance powerful cores with a frequency of up to 2.8 GHz, which is higher than the previous generation. In the synthetic Antutu test, it scored 270,461 points, which is higher than 835. The Adreno 630 mobile video accelerator is one of the most powerful on the market and performs excellently when working with graphics, providing high quality image smartphone user.

4 Kirin 980

7 nm process technology
Country: China
Average price: 76,990 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.7

Kirin 980 is ahead of its time thanks to the best technical innovations, including:

  • An innovative approach to creating the core processor architecture and the latest mobile chipset with a 7 nm process technology;
  • Use of Cortex-A76 core in architecture;
  • Two neural network modules in the chip;
  • Graphics Mali-G76;
  • Built-in Cat.21 modem with data transfer speeds up to 1.4 Gbps;
  • Support random access memory LPDDR4X format with a frequency of 2133 MHz.

Thanks to the transition to a 7-Pnm process technology, productivity has increased by 20% and energy savings by 40%. At the same time, the density of transistors increased by 1.6 times. There are about 7 billion of them in total. This also had a positive effect on the performance per core, which increased performance by 75%. Thus, the power of the component is enough to outperform even one of the best and powerful processors today - Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 in synthetic tests like GeekBench.

3 Exynos 9810

The best processor from Samsung
Country: Vietnam
Average price: RUB 51,490.
Rating (2018): 4.8

New processor from Samsung displays the degree of interaction between the owner and his device on new level. Advanced technologies make it possible to identify objects or people for quick search or image classification. There is also the ability to scan facial contours to unlock your smartphone. As for the structure, the processor itself belongs to the 3rd and latest generation in the line. It is characterized wide possibilities in data processing and optimized cache memory. Eight cores are divided into “user” for normal tasks and “resource-intensive” for “heavy” processes.

So the processor shows excellent results in all tests, demonstrating excellent computing capabilities and smooth operation while running many processes with minimal power consumption. In addition, data transmission channels ( 1.2 Gbit/s and 200 Mbit/s respectively) provide comfortable data transmission of any format without loss of quality.

2 A11 Bionic

One of the most powerful chipsets in the world
Country: USA
Average price: 51,990 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.9

The fifth generation processor has increased by 25% more powerful version A10. It is manufactured using a 10 nm process technology, which, together with special technology increase energy efficiency by 70%. The performance improvement can be attributed to the processor cores called Monsun and Mistral. This chipset has two additional kernels and is capable of asymmetric multiprocessing. This means that it can use all six cores simultaneously.

The processor is equipped with a new ASP, which helps with the new portrait mode. Dual-parallel cores can process up to 600 billion operations per second and create effects even on video. Delightful Animoji are made possible thanks to a powerful neural engine. Despite the excellent performance, this processor can only be found in smartphones from Apple, which is a significant disadvantage.

1 A12 Bionic

The best processor from Apple
Country: USA
Average price: 91,900 rub.
Rating (2018): 5.0

Version A12 is considered the best and most powerful processor in the world. When examining it, one immediately notices the balanced use of the lithographic plate area without imbalance to one or another component. Two large performance cores operate at a frequency just below 2.5 GHz. Nearby is a monstrously large 8 MB cache, divided into 4 clusters grouped into two blocks. The most noticeable change The level 1 cache was increased from 64+64 to 128+128. 4 energy-efficient tempest cores also have a level 2 cache in two blocks, approximately one megabyte each. System cache remained in its place and is still placed outside the boundaries of the CPU. High-performance cores in the new iteration have become 15% more powerful, and energy efficiency has increased to 50%.

The processor has a graphics accelerator with a neural processing unit. It consists of 6 cores in a 2+4 configuration and performs up to 5 trillion operations per second, which is 9 times faster than the previous generation. This “stone” can be found in the latest models of IPhoneXS/XR smartphones; in addition, a version of the chip with the 12X index is used in the iPad PRO.

The entire hardware operation of a smartphone depends on the processor. Every year the question of choosing between the two technologies Qualcomm Snapdragon and MediaTek becomes more relevant, as in computer field between Intel and AMD. Has there been a definitive opinion on this matter?

In Android phones, the chipset (system-on-chip, SoC) is loaded with games, browsing the Internet, and even making mobile calls. This is the “brain” that is responsible for speed, efficiency and reliability.

Today, smartphone manufacturers choose Qualcomm Snapdragon or MediaTek solutions (with the exception of isolated proprietary developments from Samsung, Huawei, LG and Xiaomi experiments). The fundamental difference between them is that one is already at the top of its segment, and the second, step by step, is just climbing the ladder of success.

Difference between Qualcomm Snapdragon and MediaTek

Qualcomm is better known in the US and Europe. Its processors power flagship models, run expensive advertising campaigns, and provide widespread support from software developers. MediaTek is playing catch-up - it is slowly, although surely, capturing significant market share in South Asia.

What factors make the processors from these two manufacturers different and unique?

Qualcomm positions Snapdragon not as a processor, but as a platform - a turnkey solution with a set of system semiconductor products on a chip (SoC), designed and sold exclusively for mobile devices. Its compute unit uses the ARM RISC instruction set.

Such a system-on-chip may include several processor cores (CPU), a graphics accelerator (GPU), wireless modem, software (part of the firmware) and hardware. The latter is necessary to support various smart functions from global system smartphone positioning (GPS) to gesture recognition, machine learning (artificial intelligence) and camera manipulation.

Snapdragon chipset is built into the devices various systems, including Android, Windows Phone, from recent since Windows 10, as well as in netbooks, cars, wearable gadgets and so on.

Qualcomm is located in the United States and is headquartered in San Diego, California. It has earned the Snapdragon brand the title of high-quality, high-performance SoCs that you will find in mid-budget and flagship smartphones famous manufacturers. Snapdragon processors can be single-core, dual-core, quad-core, six-core, or eight-core.

It has been creating processors for smartphones and tablets relatively recently. But in a short time they gained wide popularity and even widespread reorganization mobile industry. Thanks to the cost-effective cost of finished products, the company has achieved popularity and recognition, since its chipsets have made it possible to obtain flagship functions in the budget and mid-budget segments.

The company has earned a name as an impeccable supplier of reliable semiconductor products. Its headquarters is located in Taiwan, where strategic decisions are made to capture the Asian market. MediaTek processors include single-core, dual-core, quad-core, six-core, eight-core and deca-core configurations.

Qualcomm Snapdragon or MediaTek - which is better and why?

Most MediaTek chipsets focus on power. Qualcomm tries to maintain a balance between various tasks. They strive to be as efficient as possible, not just fast. This is why smartphones, and especially budget ones, running MediaTek processors sometimes outperform those using an equivalent Snapdragon.

Nevertheless, high power MediaTek has often relied on the lack of compromise between time battery life and skipping cycles (braking due to overheating), low price and forming a brand name in benchmarks.

Battery life:

MediaTek chipsets are believed to consume more power and result in shorter battery life. IN recent generations They optimize their processors so that they are virtually on par with their competitors in terms of battery life.

Here is the situation regarding energy efficiency. The main reason for this is continuous testing. Qualcomm is constantly looking for ways to reduce battery load while maintaining real-time performance.

Winner

In 2018, both processors keep pace with progress and significantly extend the life of a smartphone on a single charge. But Qualcomm top processors Snapdragon has had more success.

Performance

He copes well with intense and difficult tasks, showing his best side in multitasking. This is thanks to the additional computing cores. But the architecture of new generations of chipsets has increased requirements for RAM.

  • Qualcomm

In the middle class, competitive advantages may be hidden in special technologies (fast charging, machine learning or gesture recognition), but this results in a higher cost. But in flagship lines Snapdragon has no equal.

Winner

In a general budget comparison, MediaTek is an extremely attractive choice with excellent performance. But in the higher class, Qualcomm has the upper hand.

GPU

Chipsets use third-party Mali graphics, which differ from the processor architecture and may not match its potential. It's important to choose platforms where the graphics accelerator matches the efficiency of the computing unit (CPU) to get a decent gaming experience.

  • Qualcomm

The proprietary Adreno Graphics technology is developed by the chipmaker himself and represents always consistent performance with the main block of the Snapdragon processor. This approach does not lead to desynchronization of graphics and processing power.

Winner

Mali graphics are not inferior to Adreno, but if MediaTek has a configuration with a performance discrepancy, then you should forget about demanding 3D games. Qualcomm is aggressively pushing for a clearer positioning of its processors. Whether they are ready for games or not is already clear from the name of the chipset. Moreover, many application developers strive to better optimization specifically for the API for Snapdragon, as a more popular and convenient hardware platform for research.

RESULT: Is it worth buying MediaTek, or is Qualcomm Snapdragon the best?

To answer this question you need to understand your preferences. It depends on the price.

Qualcomm's Snapdragon has the lead now, but MediaTek is outperforming its rival in the affordable segment by offering better performance, identical power consumption, but at a much lower cost. If you want a device budget segment and are not ready to put up with power losses, then MediaTek chipsets certainly win. On the other hand, if you are someone who needs overall efficiency and optimization from developers, look no further than Snapdragon.

In other words, when you need a smartphone in price category up to 250 dollars, then MediaTek processors will often offer more than Snapdragon. Recently, competition has become more intense as powerful chipsets such as MediaTek MT6752 and MT6595 have appeared with performance similar and sometimes better than their Qualcomm counterparts.

There are many smartphones and tablets on the market, especially Chinese ones. They have different “fillings”, so it’s very easy to get confused. We decided to write a comparison mobile processors and determine the best in each price category. We will try to explain in the most accessible way, in simple language, which processor should be installed in your new smartphone so that it can satisfy all your needs.

In this article you will not find any technical terms or abstruse things. Our goal is to explain as clearly as possible to the average user who wants to choose good smartphone, but there is no time to read a bunch of literature and understand the intricacies.

What processors are on the market?

As a matter of fact, in 2018 there are several processor manufacturers on the market:

  • Kirin- a proprietary processor that is used only in products of the company and the Honor sub-brand.
  • Exynos- development Samsung, are used in branded devices, but in Lately are also installed in smartphones from other companies, for example.
  • MediaTek- processors from a fabless semiconductor company from Taiwan. In the CIS countries they are considered quite cheap, so they are not considered in expensive devices.
  • Apple A(x)- developed by the company of the same name, used only in Apple products.
  • - processors of an American company whose production facilities are located in China. These processors are considered to be of very high quality and are installed in almost 80% of smartphones on the market. Moreover, Snapdragons of different performance levels can be seen even in Huawei smartphones and Samsung, which have their own chips.
  • Surge- the company’s processors, which are so far used only in the cheapest smartphones and exclusively on the Chinese market.

I should immediately note that processors from Apple And Xiaomi there is no point in considering. The first - because they are used only in iPhone and iPad, are optimized exclusively for operating system iOS, and on AliExpress and in general. Concerning Surge from Xiaomi, they began to be developed quite recently, and they will not appear on our market soon.

Huawei Kirin processors

There is a lot of indignation about these processors on the Internet. Like, they often freeze, the interfaces don’t work very well, and so on. There are also complaints about the smartphone heating up when playing games, the battery draining quickly, and poor optimization. This is very strange, since all the Kirin smartphones that I was lucky enough to use did not cause any problems.

In 2018, the line of MTK chips was updated, and even Xiaomi, which previously dealt only with Snapdragon processors, began to use them in production.

When choosing a smartphone with a MediaTek processor, you need to pay attention to the brand. For example, the same Sony and Meizu will work 99% perfectly with MTK.

Exynos from Samsung

To be honest, I don’t really like these processors, and I wouldn’t buy anything on Exynos for myself. An interesting point is that the flagship smartphones Samsung Galaxy S8 and S9 are sold in two versions: with a proprietary processor and with a chip from Qualcomm. It is the latter option that the vast majority of bloggers and reviewers recommend purchasing. I really love Meizu products, but the only device that I didn’t like was the Pro 6 Plus on Exynos processor. He worked simply disgustingly. My personal opinion - Devices with these processors are not worth buying.

Many may disagree with me, especially the owners Samsung devices, but have you tried using other smartphones? You may have been lucky with a good version of the processor, but latest models have problems with the scheduler, which significantly reduces performance. Another argument - budget devices Korean company significantly lose to competitors from China. Perhaps this is due to higher salaries at Korean factories, which affects the cost of the device: you have to install less memory, cheaper materials, and so on.

Qualcomm Snapdragon processors

These processors are considered the most popular and, accordingly, the most widespread on the market. Of course, they are of high quality, but in the middle price segment, in my opinion, they are overrated. For example, if you choose between Snapdragon 660 And Helio P20, then I will give preference to the processor from MTK, because it seemed to me faster. But if you choose between the most productive products of companies, Qualcomm will be out of competition with any other brands. All flagship Android smartphones, including the reference Google Pixel 2, are equipped Snapdragon 845 or 835 (the first is newer, but in general they are almost the same). Other best smartphones of 2018 are equipped with these processors.

In the budget segment, these processes are also widely represented, but I do not like their performance, unlike their counterparts on MTK and Kirin. For example, those available on Snapdragon 430 work extremely slowly and heat up significantly even when watching videos on YouTube, which is most likely due to insufficient power chip. The same Meizu M5s on an outdated stone from MTK for the same price behaves much better.

Comparison of mobile processors: What's the conclusion?

First, we completely abandon processors from Apple (if you want an Android device), Samsung and Xiaomi. Let's go further: in the cheapest smartphones we give preference to Kirin and, possibly, MTK, but processors from Huawei are higher in priority. In the middle price segment, we choose smartphones based on Kirin or Helio P20 from MediaTek. When choosing the most expensive smartphones, there is only one option - Snapdragon 845 (835).

Here short guide By modern processors. This is a purely personal opinion. If you disagree with me, be sure to write in the comments. Commentary is welcome!

Until recently, MediaTek was associated by most users with buggy Chinese smartphones, but didn’t say anything to the others. But as time passed, the Taiwanese manufacturer became stronger, gained experience, and now their processors are already installed in a huge number of smartphones from the most serious players in the market. But the American manufacturer Qualcomm did not stand still - their Snapdragon processors are recognized, occupying a huge percentage of the market. At one time, they even managed to oust such a giant as Texas Instruments. So which processor is better to choose a smartphone with - MTK or Snapdragon? We will try to give the answer in this article.

What do these companies have in common?

Both manufacturers Qualcomm and MediaTek are engaged only in the development of processors, and their final production is carried out at the facilities of TSMS factories. These are huge factories specializing in the production of crystals. Also, both companies are developing processors for smartphones of all price niches, and both have ARM architecture (which is radically different from that used in x86 personal computers). This is where the similarities end, which is remarkable, because companies are fighting in the same market, but they develop and promote their products to the masses in completely different ways.

Advantages and disadvantages of MediaTek

The Taiwanese company produces processors that have a number of positive features:

  • A huge number of products. The company initially produced processors only for budget categories of smartphones, but the company is moving Full time job, because of which the lineup expanding every month. True, there is still no wide choice in the flagship segment, but mid-range and budget models a huge quantity is offered;
  • Extremely low price. The company was best positioned to gain a foothold in the budget segment, since the price of their processors made it possible to sell smartphones at ridiculous prices. The cost of even the most powerful Helio processors does not exceed the price of mid-range solutions from other manufacturers;
  • Built-in graphics. More often than not, most MTK chips are equipped with graphics chips Mali, produced by ARM. Architecture graphics cores reference, thanks to which developers can easily optimize their games and applications for it, which is much more difficult to do with Adreno. By the way, Samsung also installs Mali graphics in its smartphones, so developers try to adapt games for it first of all.

MTK processors also have a lot of disadvantages:

  • Not the best configurations. In order to attract more buyers while maintaining performance and autonomy at the proper level, the company chose a rather crooked path, which is why in practice the processors show far from the most brilliant results that are offered on paper. For example, the Helio processor uses 3 clusters of cores, the microarchitecture of which is different, as well as the clock frequency. 10 cores are, of course, easier to advertise, but in reality they turned out to be slower than the four energy-efficient ones in the Snapdragon 820;
  • Cortex cores. For financial reasons, the company cannot improve the microarchitecture, which is why it has to use standard cores in processors. This makes their products weaker than competitors from Qualcomm, Apple or Samsung;
  • The hardware is poorly balanced. For example, the Mali T880 MP4 video accelerator has three times fewer active units, which means three times less performance;
  • Poor support from developers. This situation has recently begun to improve, but developers still have many problems with support for MTK processors. This results in producers receiving late necessary drivers, which is why you have to install old version Android or release updates on time;
  • Outdated technical process. MediaTek does not have the ability to invest in process development, so they rarely get the opportunity to work with the most modern assembly lines. Because of this, processors are manufactured using outdated technologies, which is especially true for flagship models.

Advantages and disadvantages of Qualcomm

American processors have more significant benefits before MediaTek:

  • Using your own kernels. Based on ready-made kernels Cortex, but Qualcomm specialists are making their own improvements to improve performance and optimize power consumption;
  • Its own graphics. For graphics processing Qualcomm processors responds with its own subsystem, called Adreno. Qualcomm is entirely responsible for its creation, controlling the process from the first drawings to launch. serial production. This allows you to connect graphics and processor better than competitors;
  • Higher levels of autonomy. The manufacturer tries to make its processors not only powerful, but also energy efficient, constantly working on this indicator with each new model. For example, after the 820 processor was replaced by the 821 version, it became slightly faster, but at the same time it began to consume less power. This is especially interesting, because there are practically no differences in architecture;
  • Work is also underway on the power of cellular modules. Modems used in Qualcomm processors are developed taking into account the latest technologies. A striking example is LTE Cat technology. 12, which is supported by many modern smartphones, and here mobile operators They don’t yet have this technology. Also, modems from Americans support much more cellular standards than theirs. Taiwanese competitors;
  • Modern technical process. Manufacturer Qualcomm is trying to constantly improve production, constantly moving to more sophisticated technical processes. New technologies are first tested on the most expensive devices, after which more affordable products are introduced into new production.

But there was a fly in the ointment here:

  • A small number of solutions for the budget segment. The company tries to produce quality processors mainly for flagship solutions, making them faster and more energy efficient, but budget smartphones much less attention is paid. Until recently, Qualcomm had only three budget processors - 200, 400 and 410. By the way, their price is significantly higher than that from the Taiwanese manufacturer;
  • High price. Since the company constantly uses modern technologies, improving production, they have to spend enormous amounts of money on their implementation. Because of this, the price of processors is very high. For example, the cost of Snapdragon 821 was $70 in 2016;
  • Complex bootloader. The Snapdragon CPU bootloader has a complex architecture. This does not affect during use, but restoring a smartphone from a “brick” state is much more difficult.

Results

It is difficult to finally decide which processors are better; both have a lot of advantages and disadvantages. To make a choice, it is better to group smartphones by price categories.

In the budget niche it is difficult to find the difference. Therefore, both manufacturers make good solutions that allow you to work comfortably with a smartphone. But the cost of devices on MTK is significantly lower. Therefore, the choice here is obvious.

In the middle class the advantages of Taiwanese processors fade into the background. Qualcomm is more energy efficient and has more powerful graphics. But in terms of performance there is not much difference.

And in the flagship category, the choice is obvious - there is only Qualcomm, since it is the leader in this segment of the Android smartphone market. MediaTek cannot yet provide adequate resistance; even the top Helio model does not help. Moreover, the Helio X30 version will not use the most powerful PowerVR GT7400 graphics accelerator, which is almost two times slower than the Adreno 530, which is more than relevant today.

What is a processor?

Without going into details, this is the central element of the system, which is responsible for all information transformations and controls the computing process.

The mobile version of the chip (ARM) is not much different from its stationary counterpart. The only differences are in size, power and clock frequency.

The latter have lower figures.

All of them have achieved success in this industry, but the main struggle is between the Chinese company MediaTek and the American Qualcomm.

Qualcomm

The silicon giant was founded back in 1985. The company produced phones, GPS modules and wireless devices.

We will consider it as largest manufacturer mobile chips.

In 2005, they licensed ARM technologies, purchasing the rights to create the Cortex A8 core. Based on it, our own chip was developed.

The top line of chips is called Snapdragon.

These processors are installed in such flagship devices as Sony Xperia Z line, HTC One, LG G2 and G3 and some models Samsung.

But the latest top-end chip Snapdragon 810 has caused a lot of discussion. Some said that it overheats greatly, causing performance to suffer.

But this fact remained undocumented.

8 cores, Cat 6 LTE chip, giving speeds up to 300 Mbps, support for 4K video, as well as sensors up to 55 MP. The figures are impressive.

MediaTek

They take advantage not only of quality, but also of mass production, supplying products to all smartphones costing up to $200.

The most famous “stone”, namely MT6592, installed on budget phones like Lenovo, in particular the S860 and more.

They were the first to develop a 10-core processor called Xelio X20. On this moment is the most powerful single-chip system in the world.

Recruits more than 70,000 “parrots” in AnTuTu. Not yet serially produced.

Specifications include 3 blocks of cores: 2x2.5 GHz, 4x2 GHz and 4x1.4 GHz. Mali 800 graphics and support for 2 13 MP sensors. Wi-Fi support 802.11ac and LTE Cat 6.

Apple

Cupertino residents have always been famous for their closeness. Their unofficial motto can be interpreted as follows: “You don’t need to know what’s inside. Just take it and use it."

And this applies to all the company's products.

As for the mobile division, the situation here is no less confusing.

It is only known that the company itself develops processors for smartphones and tablets, assigning them an A index and a serial number.

In particular, A8 and A8X are considered the most powerful mobile stones. They are equipped with iPhone 6/6 Plus And iPad Air respectively.

Despite 2 cores of 1.4 GHz and an M8 coprocessor, the performance is impressive.

Intel

Despite the fact that this giant leads the ranking of mobile processors for laptops, in the field mobile development he's actually sitting on the bench.

Although the fact that smartphones equipped with chips Intel Atom, are in high demand, we can say that the company is making progress.

Now the strongest chip that is used in series is Z3580. 4 cores at a frequency of 2.33 will give a head start even to such “players” as Snapdragon 801 and Apple A7.

Specifications: 4x2.33 GHz, DDR-1600 support and proprietary graphics from Intel.

Nvidia

The situation with a company that is famous for gaming and overclocker video cards similar to Nvidia.

In their main field, they achieved outstanding results, but things didn’t work out with the mobile segment.

In particular, Tegra chips have good potential, but leading manufacturers are in no hurry to purchase processors in batches.

Yes, Nvidia hardware will be appreciated by gamers.

But the majority of smartphone users are businessmen, young people over the age of 20, and girls who are unlikely to want to “play Doom on ultra.”