Radeon r5 m430 2gb reviews. AMD Radeon R5 M430: characteristics and tests in games

Graphics accelerator for laptops AMD Radeon R5 labeled M430 debuted on store shelves computer technology in the first half of 2016. This is an entry-level discrete accelerator. In it, the manufacturer tried to combine acceptable performance and maximum degree energy efficiency. In this review we will try to answer how he managed to combine these two radically different parameters.

Features of the accelerator. His specialty

Quite high demands are placed on the AMD Radeon R5 mobile accelerator in the discrete version of the M430 model. On the one hand, this device must be energy efficient. That is, the power consumed by it during operation should be minimal. Due to this, the time increases significantly battery life computer. On the other hand, the performance of such an adapter should be higher than that of integrated video cards. If this condition is not met, then the feasibility of producing such an accelerator is lost.

The main area of ​​application of such a video card is mobile computers entry level. Such PCs can cope with the least demanding modern gaming applications, For example. In addition to this, it is quite comfortable to develop on such a laptop. various programs. In addition, the presence of discrete graphics even allows you to process images and pictures in a small volume. That is, such a PC is at the same time affordable (they have a low cost), productive and moderately autonomous.

Main technical parameters of the GPU

The characteristics of the AMD Radeon R5 in the M430 version indicate that it is based on the SutXT microprocessor. The developers included 320 streaming modules for processing graphic information. In turn, this solution has only 20 texture units, and 8 raster pipelines. All these elements of the graphics accelerator operate at a clock frequency of 1030 MHz. It is also necessary to note separately that last value was strictly fixed. This decision did not allow dynamically increasing the frequency in the case of a very complex task.

Semiconductor base and its specifications

As previously noted, this discrete accelerator for mobile computers is based on the Sun XT chip based on the GCN architecture revision 1.0. Its silicon crystal was manufactured to 28nm tolerance standards. In this case, the transistors have a surface layout. Therefore, for normal cooling of such an adapter it is necessary to mandatory it should be equipped with a cooler. In combination with an aluminum radiator, such an accelerator will not function stably because it overheats during operation. In turn, the presence of a system active cooling graphics chip increases the noise level of the laptop. But there is no way to escape this disadvantage.

Memory subsystem

Graphics accelerator for portable computers AMD Radeon Graphics The R5 model M430 was equipped with a separate RAM, which contained only the information it processed. Moreover, only a discrete accelerator can interact with this RAM. The type of memory used is DDR3, which operates at a frequency of 1800 MHz, and the bus width for connecting to it is 64 bits. The total volume of the video buffer is 2 GB. That is, such an accelerator is perfect for those cases when it is necessary to display images in HD or even FullHD formats. But if you switch to “4K” mode in this situation, problems may arise with the smooth operation of the interface.

Performance Evaluation

In the test package graphic accelerators PCMark’11 AMD Radeon R5 M430 scores 1689 points at a rather modest resolution of 1280 x 800. In this case, the same performance is demonstrated by the R5 M330 and HDGraphics 630 accelerators. The hero of this review is one percent ahead of the 920M and GT 640M. The result obtained in this test Once again it proves that this adapter really belongs to the series of entry-level gaming devices.

In a toy Diablo III this accelerator in a similar mode and with low quality Pictures can be produced at 66fps. That is, in this mode this application will function quite comfortably. In medium quality mode, such an accelerator in this game will already produce 42fps.

Setting procedure. Features of the configuration

The algorithm for setting up such an accelerator is quite simple. There is no need to install this accelerator on a computer because it is already inside the computer system. Therefore, the first step in setting up a PC is in this case- This is the installation of system software. Again, some computers are already sold with such software pre-installed. In this case this stage must be skipped.

The next step is to install AMD drivers Radeon R5. As a rule, the laptop delivery list includes a disk with such software. If such a component is not included by the manufacturer in the package, then necessary software can be pre-downloaded from World Wide Web. Then we start the installation process, having first followed the instructions of the installation wizard. After completing this operation, it is strongly recommended to reboot computer system. This will allow the changes made to the software to take effect.

Reviews

The advantages of this AMD Radeon R5 model include reliability, performance and energy efficiency among experts and users. Besides the cost mobile systems with such an accelerator it is quite democratic. There is only one disadvantage in this case - the need for additional equipment of this adapter a separate cooler, which creates unnecessary noise during PC operation. But, as previously noted, this defect cannot be eliminated.

Conclusion

The AMD Radeon R5 modification in question is still a relevant computer component. This accelerator was introduced relatively recently; new ones can still be found based on it. laptop computers. At the same time, the performance of such computers is at a sufficient level and still allows you to run software of any level of complexity. The latter also include resource-intensive toys and even graphics packages. That is, AMD engineers did enough good decision primary class, which harmoniously unites high performance and long battery life.

AMD Radeon R5 video card: review, specifications, reviews from experts on the site.

The AMD Radeon R5 M430 is an entry-level laptop graphics card. How good is AMD video card Radeon R5 M430 2 GB? I'll answer now.

Most laptops with this chip run on the i5-7200U. Which just looks good because it belongs to the 7th generation series. But it only works with two cores and honestly this is not ice for games. And if that's not what you're looking for! Even when you couple that with 8GB random access memory and R5 M430, you are nowhere you won't achieve productivity not even close to a desktop PC build that's the same price!

On the other side, Radeon card belongs to the same level as the processor with which it is usually associated. The video card has DDR3 memory type, which is already a little outdated. Although the speed 2000 MHz! However, this is GFXBench 3.0, and the 3DMark score is nowhere near chips like the Iris Pro 6000 series.

How good is the AMD Radeon R5 M430 2 GB video card and what can it handle:

Games like FIFA, Overwatch, League of Legends, DOTA, F1, Total War: Warhammer, World of Tanks, World of Warships, Titanfall, Farming Simulator and Rocket League will launch without problems. From 60–70 fps.

And games like SIMS, Diablo 3, CS:GO & Street Fighter which are old but extremely popular will work the same way on 60–70 fps!

You can probably run all the games before 2015. Without any problems on medium and high settings! (even GTA V and Crysis 3)

However, you will have terrible gameplay when you launch today's popular games. Such as BF1, Call Of Duty: Infinite Warfare, Call Of Duty Advanced Warfare Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, Deus-EX Mankind Divided, Star Wars Battlefront, Need for Speed ​​2016, Riseof the Tomb Raider, Far Cry 4, Metal Gear Solid 5, Metro Last Night, Just Cause 3, Bioshock Infinite and Dishonored 2 will work, but you won't get higher 20-25 fps.

Note: each game launch is tested for low settings; 1280x720 - 1366x768! All test results are based on a system that is connected to charge!

AND TOM CLANCY’S THE DIVISION, WATCH DOGS 2, ASHES OF THE SINGULARITY, XCOM 2, FALLOUT 4. Also, THE WITCHER 3, HORIZON ZERO:DOWN, PREY AND RESIDENT EVIL WILL SIMPLY REFUSE TO LAUNCH!

And play top games It is not recommended! I know that all these games will launch. But after a good gaming session you will literally feel your laptop start to sweat and you will have to put it in the drying cabinet :) And it also causes great harm processor and other parts. These games also take up a lot of space!

If you're looking for performance with the AMD Radeon R5 M430 after that, yes, the graphics card will perform well when paired with the 7200U. You can make 1080P video with a bang. And Photoshop & Lightroom will fly.

Overall, if you just want this card for work and light productivity, then the AMD Radeon R5 M430 will do the trick. For hardcore games, it’s better to build a regular PC!

Compared to Nvidia

Simply put, it's the performance equivalent of AMD's Nvidia GT 940M.

There is a difference between Nvidia's naming scheme,

GT = entry/low end mainly for lite gaming, not for pro gamers.

GTX = medium to high end/enthusias — a high resolution, high-quality graphics, high FPS in games.

RTX - ray tracing - modern video cards, which will soon appear on the market. Look forward to.

So, with this knowledge, draw your conclusions.

Please note that performance varies depending on the graphics memory used. Also on the clock frequency, processor, system settings, drivers and operating systems.

Comparison of the GeForce 920M video card from NVIDIA and the Radeon R5 M430 from AMD.

Despite the fact that the GeForce 920M is “older” (release date: 01/27/15), it can be a good competitor to the newer model from AMD (released 05/01/2016). But first things first.

Main characteristics:

Nvidia GeForce 920M AMD Radeon R5 M430
Manufacturer: NVIDIA AMD
Series: GeForce 900M Radeon R5 M400
Architecture: Kepler Sun XT
Execution cores: 384 – unifield 320 – unifield
Core frequency: 0.58 – 1(Boost) GHz 0.8 (Boost) GHz
Video memory frequency: 1.8 GHz 2 GHz
Memory bus: 64 bit 64 bit
RAM stick type: DDR3 DDR3
Technical process: 28 Nm 28 Nm

Thus, in terms of characteristics, these video cards are almost identical, except for the fact that the GeForce 920M has 64 more shader processors. And also above clock frequency at maximum load, which will give higher performance than that of the video card from AMD. But is the difference really that significant?

When tested in benchmarks, GeForce showed an average of 15% best performance than a Radeon card. And in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU graphics The adapter from NVIDIA was ahead of its competitor from AMD by as much as 30%, showing a result of 7242.0, while the Radeon showed a result of 5493.0. Therefore, if the buyer intends to use the video card in professional programs type Sony Vegas, then you should definitely give preference to the GeForce 920M.

What can please gamers? Unfortunately, there is nothing special. The GeForce 920M demonstrated, on average, 5-7% higher performance than the Radeon M430, which cannot be considered a large gap. However, in some popular Geforce games The 920M showed significant superiority compared to the Radeon card:

GeForce 920M Radeon R5 M430
Overwatch (2016)
Low settings: 54 fps 41.3 fps
Medium settings: 38.4 fps 31.3 fps
GTA V (2015)
Low settings: 55.9 fps 36.0 fps
Medium settings: 37.2 fps 30.5 fps
Sims 4
Low settings: 175.8 fps 123.4 fps
Medium settings: 73.0 fps 35.7 fps


Thus, Gifors outperforms Radeon in various demanding programs and games. Although in the second, the video adapter from NVIDIA does not show obvious success in most games, being ahead of Radeon, as a rule, by 3-5 fps.

If we talk about cost, then, of course, the video card from AMD wins. For example, an HP 17-x001ds laptop with Radeon R5 M430 costs 24,000 rubles. While Asus X555L with GeForce video card 920M 29,000 rubles. But we must not forget about quality. NVIDIA video cards have always been famous for their durability and trouble-free operation. What not to say about graphics adapters from AMD, which, to the detriment of their configuration and operating time, offer low prices.

Summarizing:

As a result of comparing the characteristics and cost, as well as comparing the performance of these models, we can conclude: it is impossible to determine the winner here.

If you need a cheap video card with good performance, but a high probability of overheating or a short operating life, then the choice should definitely fall on a video card from AMD.

If you need a video card with similar performance, but with a longer operating life and less likelihood of overheating, then you should take Gifors. But you should remember that this video adapter costs much more than Radeon.