Which type of monitor matrix is better? Monitor matrix type AH-IPS. Fundamentals of monitoring. Matrix types: IPS

Smartphone display technologies do not stand still; they are constantly being improved. Today there are 3 main types of matrices: TN, IPS, AMOLED. There are often debates about the advantages and disadvantages of IPS and AMOLED matrices and their comparison. But TN screens have not been in fashion for a long time. This is an old development that is now practically not used in new phones. Well, if it is used, it is only in very cheap state employees.

Comparison of TN matrix and IPS

TN matrices were the first to appear in smartphones, so they are the most primitive. The main advantage of this technology is its low cost. The cost of a TN display is 50% lower compared to the cost of other technologies. Such matrices have a number of disadvantages: small viewing angles (no more than 60 degrees. If more, the picture begins to distort), poor color rendition, low contrast. The logic of manufacturers to abandon this technology is clear - there are a lot of shortcomings, and all of them are serious. However, there is one advantage: response time. In TN matrices the response time is only 1 ms, although in IPS screens the response time is usually 5-8 ms. But this is just one plus that cannot be weighed against all the minuses. After all, even 5-8 ms is enough to display dynamic scenes, and in 95% of cases the user will not notice the difference between response times of 1 and 5 ms. In the photo below the difference is clearly visible. Note the color distortion at angles on the TN matrix.

Unlike TN, IPS matrices show high contrast and have huge viewing angles (sometimes even maximum). This type is the most common, and they are sometimes referred to as SFT matrices. There are many modifications of these matrices, so when listing the pros and cons, you need to keep in mind a specific type. Therefore, below, to list the advantages, we will mean the most modern and expensive IPS matrix, and to list the disadvantages, the cheapest.

Pros:

Maximum viewing angles.
High energy efficiency (low energy consumption).
Accurate color reproduction and high brightness.
The ability to use high resolution, which will give a higher pixel density per inch (dpi).
Good behavior in the sun.

Minuses:

Higher price compared to TN.
Distortion of colors when the display is tilted too far (however, viewing angles are not always maximum on some types).
Oversaturation of color and insufficient saturation.

Today, most phones have IPS matrices. Gadgets with TN displays are used only in the corporate sector. If a company wants to save money, then it can order monitors or, for example, cheaper phones for its employees. They may have TN matrices, but no one buys such devices for themselves.

Amoled and SuperAmoled screens

Most often, Samsung smartphones use SuperAMOLED matrices. This company owns this technology, and many other developers are trying to buy it or borrow it.

The main feature of AMOLED matrices is the depth of black color. If you put an AMOLED display and an IPS side by side, then the black color on the IPS will seem light compared to the AMOLED. The very first such matrices had implausible color reproduction and could not boast of color depth. Often there was so-called acidity or excessive brightness on the screen.

But developers at Samsung have corrected these shortcomings in SuperAMOLED screens. These have specific advantages:

Low power consumption;
Better picture compared to the same IPS matrices.

Flaws:

Higher cost;
The need to calibrate (set) the display;
Rarely can the lifespan of diodes vary.

AMOLED and SuperAMOLED matrices are installed on the top flagships due to the best picture quality. Second place is occupied by IPS screens, although it is often impossible to distinguish between AMOLED and IPS matrix in terms of picture quality. But in this case, it is important to compare subtypes, and not technologies as a whole. Therefore, you need to be on guard when choosing a phone: often advertising posters indicate the technology, and not a specific matrix subtype, and the technology does not play a key role in the final quality of the picture on the display. BUT! If TN+film technology is indicated, then in this case it is worth saying “no” to such a phone.

Innovation

Removing the OGS air gap

Every year engineers introduce image enhancement technologies. Some of them are forgotten and not used, and some make a splash. OGS technology is just that.

Typically, a phone screen consists of protective glass, the matrix itself, and an air gap between them. OGS allows you to get rid of the extra layer - the air gap - and make the matrix part of the protective glass. As a result, the image appears to be on the surface of the glass, rather than hidden underneath it. The effect of improving display quality is obvious. Over the past couple of years, OGS technology has been unofficially considered a standard for any more or less normal phones. Not only expensive flagships are equipped with OGS screens, but also budget phones and even some very cheap models.

Screen glass bending

The next interesting experiment, which later became an innovation, is 2.5D glass (that is, almost 3D). Thanks to the curves of the screen at the edges, the picture becomes more voluminous. If you remember, the first Samsung Galaxy Edge smartphone made a splash - it was the first (or not?) to have a display with 2.5D glass, and it looked amazing. There is even an additional touch panel on the side for quick access to some programs.

HTC was trying to do something different. The company created the Sensation smartphone with a curved display. In this way it was protected from scratches, although it was not possible to achieve any greater benefit. Nowadays, such screens cannot be found due to the already durable and scratch-resistant protective glass Gorilla Glass.

HTC didn't stop there. The LG G Flex smartphone was created, which not only had a curved screen, but also the body itself. This was the “trick” of the device, which also did not gain popularity.

Stretchable or flexible screen from Samsung

As of mid-2017, this technology is not yet used in any phone available on the market. However, Samsung in videos and at its presentations demonstrates AMOLED screens that can stretch and then return to their original position.

Photo of the flexible display fromSamsung:

The company also presented a demo video where you can clearly see the screen curving by 12 mm (as the company itself states).

It is quite possible that Samsung will soon make a very unusual revolutionary screen that will amaze the whole world. This will be a revolution in terms of display design. It's hard to even imagine how far the company will go with this technology. However, perhaps other manufacturers (Apple, for example) are also developing flexible displays, but so far there have been no such demonstrations from them.

The best smartphones with AMOLED matrices

Considering that SuperAMOLED technology was developed by Samsung, it is mainly used in models from this manufacturer. In general, Samsung is a leader in the development of improved screens for mobile phones and TVs. We already understood this.

Today, the best display of all existing smartphones is the SuperAMOLED screen in the Samsung S8. This is even confirmed in the DisplayMate report. For those who don’t know, Display Mate is a popular resource that analyzes screens inside and out. Many experts use their test results in their work.

To define the screen in S8, we even had to introduce a new term - Infinity Display. It received this name due to its unusual elongated shape. Unlike its previous screens, Infinity Display has been seriously improved.

Here is a short list of benefits:

Brightness up to 1000 nits. Even in bright sunshine, the content will be highly readable.
A separate chip for implementing Always On Display technology. The already economical battery now consumes even less battery power.
Picture enhancement function. In Infinity Display, content without an HDR component gains it.
Brightness and color settings are automatically adjusted based on users' preferences.
Now there is not one, but two lighting sensors, which more accurately allows you to automatically adjust the brightness.

Even compared to the Galaxy S7 Edge, which had a “reference” screen, the S8's display looks better (on it, whites are truly white, while on the S7 Edge they go warmer).

But besides the Galaxy S8, there are other smartphones with screens based on SuperAMOLED technology. These are, of course, mostly models from the Korean company Samsung. But there are also others:

Meizu Pro 6;
OnePlus 3T;
ASUS ZenFone 3 Zoom ZE553KL – 3rd place in the TOP of Asusu phones (located).
Alcatel IDOL 4S 6070K;
Motorola Moto Z Play, etc.

But it is worth noting that although the hardware (that is, the display itself) plays a key role, software is also important, as well as minor software technologies that improve picture quality. SuperAMOLED displays are famous primarily for their ability to widely adjust temperature and color settings, and if there are no such settings, then the point of using these matrices is slightly lost.

Apple's Retina displays

Since we're talking about Samsung screens, it's appropriate to mention Apple's closest competitor and their Retina technology. And although Apple uses classic IPS matrices, they are distinguished by extremely high detail, large viewing angles and good detail.

A feature of Retina displays is the ideal diagonal/resolution ratio, thanks to which the picture on the screen looks as natural as possible. That is, there are no individual pixels that are visible on screens with low resolution. At the same time, there is not even the unpleasant sharpness that can sometimes be seen on displays with excessively high resolution.

But in fact, Retina Display is based on a regular IPS matrix, so Apple has not created anything fundamentally new or revolutionary with these screens. It just made the already good IPS technology a little better.

Before the mass adoption of smartphones, when buying phones, we evaluated them mainly by design and only occasionally paid attention to functionality. Times have changed: now all smartphones have approximately the same capabilities, and when looking only at the front panel, one gadget can hardly be distinguished from another. The technical characteristics of devices have come to the fore, and the most important among them for many is the screen. We will tell you what lies behind the terms TFT, TN, IPS, PLS, and help you choose a smartphone with the desired screen characteristics.

Types of matrices

Modern smartphones mainly use three matrix production technologies: two are based on liquid crystals - TN+film and IPS, and the third - AMOLED - based on organic light-emitting diodes. But before we begin, it’s worth talking about the acronym TFT, which is the source of many misconceptions. TFT (thin-film transistor) are thin-film transistors that are used to control the operation of each subpixel of modern screens. TFT technology is used in all of the above types of screens, including AMOLED, therefore, if somewhere they talk about comparing TFT and IPS, then this is a fundamentally incorrect formulation of the question.

Most TFTs use amorphous silicon, but recently polycrystalline silicon TFTs (LTPS-TFTs) have been introduced into production. The main advantages of the new technology are reduction in power consumption and transistor sizes, which allows achieving high pixel densities (more than 500 ppi). One of the first smartphones with an IPS display and LTPS-TFT matrix was OnePlus One.

OnePlus One smartphone

Now that we have dealt with TFT, let's move directly to the types of matrices. Despite the wide variety of LCD varieties, they all have the same basic operating principle: the current applied to the liquid crystal molecules sets the polarization angle of the light (it affects the brightness of the subpixel). The polarized light then passes through the filter and is colored to match the color of the corresponding subpixel. The first to appear in smartphones were the simplest and cheapest TN+film matrices, the name of which is often abbreviated to TN. They have small viewing angles (no more than 60 degrees when deviating from the vertical), and even with slight tilts the image on screens with such matrices is inverted. Other disadvantages of TN matrices include low contrast and low color accuracy. Today, such screens are used only in the cheapest smartphones, and the vast majority of new gadgets already have more advanced displays.

The most common technology in mobile gadgets now is IPS technology, sometimes referred to as SFT. IPS matrices appeared 20 years ago and since then have been produced in various modifications, the number of which is approaching two dozen. However, it is worth highlighting among them those that are the most technologically advanced and are actively used at the moment: AH-IPS from LG and PLS from Samsung, which are very similar in their properties, which was even the reason for litigation between manufacturers . Modern modifications of IPS have wide viewing angles that are close to 180 degrees, realistic color reproduction and provide the ability to create displays with high pixel density. Unfortunately, gadget manufacturers almost never report the exact type of IPS matrix, although when using a smartphone, the differences will be visible to the naked eye. Cheaper IPS matrices are characterized by fading of the image when the screen is tilted, as well as low color accuracy: the image can be either too “acidic” or, on the contrary, “faded”.

As for energy consumption, in liquid crystal displays it is mostly determined by the power of the backlight elements (in smartphones LEDs are used for these purposes), so the consumption of TN+film and IPS matrices can be considered approximately the same at the same brightness level.

Matrixes created on the basis of organic light-emitting diodes (OLED) are completely different from LCDs. In them, the light source is the subpixels themselves, which are subminiature organic light-emitting diodes. Since there is no need for external backlighting, such screens can be made thinner than LCD ones. Smartphones use a type of OLED technology - AMOLED, which uses an active TFT matrix to control subpixels. This is what allows AMOLED to display colors, whereas regular OLED panels can only be monochrome. AMOLED matrices provide the deepest blacks, since to “display” them you only need to turn off the LEDs completely. Compared to LCDs, such matrices have lower power consumption, especially when using dark themes, in which the black areas of the screen do not consume energy at all. Another characteristic feature of AMOLED is that colors are too saturated. At the dawn of their appearance, such matrices really had implausible color rendering, and although such “childhood sores” are long in the past, most smartphones with such screens still have a built-in saturation adjustment, which allows the image on AMOLED to be closer in perception to IPS screens.

Another limitation of AMOLED screens used to be the uneven lifespan of LEDs of different colors. After a couple of years of using the smartphone, this could lead to subpixel burnout and residual images of some interface elements, primarily in the notification panel. But, as in the case of color rendering, this problem is a thing of the past, and modern organic LEDs are designed for at least three years of continuous operation.

Let's summarize briefly. The highest quality and brightest images at the moment are provided by AMOLED matrices: even Apple, according to rumors, will use such displays in one of the next iPhones. But it’s worth considering that Samsung, as the main manufacturer of such panels, keeps all the latest developments for itself, and sells “last year’s” matrices to other manufacturers. Therefore, when choosing a non-Samsung smartphone, you should look towards high-quality IPS screens. But under no circumstances should you choose gadgets with TN+film displays - today this technology is already considered outdated.

The perception of the image on the screen can be influenced not only by the matrix technology, but also by the pattern of subpixels. However, with LCDs everything is quite simple: each RGB pixel in them consists of three elongated subpixels, which, depending on the modification of the technology, can be shaped like a rectangle or a “tick”.

Everything is more interesting in AMOLED screens. Since in such matrices the light sources are the subpixels themselves, and the human eye is more sensitive to pure green light than to pure red or blue, using the same pattern in AMOLED as in IPS would degrade color reproduction and make the picture unrealistic. An attempt to solve this problem was the first version of PenTile technology, which used two types of pixels: RG (red-green) and BG (blue-green), consisting of two subpixels of corresponding colors. Moreover, if the red and blue subpixels had a shape close to squares, then the green ones looked more like highly elongated rectangles. The disadvantages of this design were the “dirty” white color, jagged edges at the junction of different colors, and at low ppi - a clearly visible grid of subpixels, appearing due to too much distance between them. In addition, the resolution indicated in the characteristics of such devices was “dishonest”: if the IPS HD matrix has 2,764,800 subpixels, then the AMOLED HD matrix has only 1,843,200, which led to a difference in the clarity of IPS and AMOLED matrices visible to the naked eye. seemingly the same pixel density. The last flagship smartphone with such an AMOLED matrix was the Samsung Galaxy S III.

In the Galaxy Note II smartpad, the South Korean company made an attempt to abandon PenTile: the device’s screen had full-fledged RBG pixels, albeit with an unusual arrangement of subpixels. However, for unclear reasons, Samsung subsequently abandoned such a design - perhaps the manufacturer was faced with the problem of further increasing ppi.

In its modern screens, Samsung has returned to RG-BG pixels using a new type of pattern called Diamond PenTile. The new technology made it possible to make the white color more natural, and as for jagged edges (for example, individual red subpixels were clearly visible around a white object on a black background), this problem was solved even more simply - by increasing the ppi to such an extent that the irregularities were no longer noticeable . Diamond PenTile is used in all Samsung flagships starting with the Galaxy S4.

At the end of this section, it is worth mentioning one more pattern of AMOLED matrices - PenTile RGBW, which is obtained by adding a fourth, white, subpixel to the three main subpixels. Before the advent of Diamond PenTile, such a pattern was the only recipe for pure white color, but it never became widespread - one of the last mobile gadgets with PenTile RGBW was the Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 tablet. Now AMOLED matrices with RGBW pixels are used in TVs, since they do not require a high ppi. To be fair, we also mention that RGBW pixels can also be used in LCDs, but we are not aware of examples of the use of such matrices in smartphones.

Unlike AMOLED, high-quality IPS matrices have never experienced quality problems associated with subpixel patterns. However, Diamond PenTile technology, coupled with high pixel density, has allowed AMOLED to catch up and overtake IPS. Therefore, if you choose gadgets pickily, you should not buy a smartphone with an AMOLED screen that has a pixel density of less than 300 ppi. At a higher density, no defects will be noticeable.

Design features

The variety of displays on modern mobile gadgets does not end with imaging technologies alone. One of the first things that manufacturers took on was the air gap between the projected capacitive sensor and the display itself. This is how OGS technology was born, combining the sensor and matrix into one glass package in the form of a sandwich. This gave a significant leap in image quality: the maximum brightness and viewing angles increased, and color rendition was improved. Of course, the thickness of the entire package has also been reduced, allowing for thinner smartphones. Alas, the technology also has disadvantages: now, if you break the glass, it is almost impossible to change it separately from the display. But the quality advantages turned out to be more important, and now non-OGS screens can only be found in the cheapest devices.

Experiments with glass shapes have also become popular recently. And they started not recently, but at least in 2011: HTC Sensation had a concave glass in the center, which, according to the manufacturer, was supposed to protect the screen from scratches. But such glass reached a qualitatively new level with the advent of “2.5D screens” with glass curved at the edges, which creates the feeling of an “infinite” screen and makes the edges of smartphones smoother. Apple actively uses such glass in its gadgets, and recently they have become more and more popular.

A logical step in the same direction was the bending of not only the glass, but also the display itself, which became possible when using polymer substrates instead of glass. Here the palm, of course, belongs to Samsung with its Galaxy Note Edge smartphone, in which one of the side edges of the screen was curved.

Another method was proposed by LG, which managed to bend not only the display, but also the entire smartphone along its short side. However, the LG G Flex and its successor did not gain popularity, after which the manufacturer abandoned further production of such devices.

Also, some companies are trying to improve human interaction with the screen by working on its touch part. For example, some devices are equipped with highly sensitive sensors that allow you to operate them even with gloves, while other screens receive an inductive substrate to support styluses. The first technology is actively used by Samsung and Microsoft (formerly Nokia), and the second by Samsung, Microsoft and Apple.

The future of screens

Don’t think that modern displays in smartphones have reached the highest point of their development: technology still has room to grow. One of the most promising are quantum dot displays (QLEDs). A quantum dot is a microscopic piece of semiconductor in which quantum effects begin to play a significant role. In a simplified way, the radiation process looks like this: exposure to a weak electric current causes the electrons of quantum dots to change energy, emitting light. The frequency of the emitted light depends on the size and material of the dots, making it possible to achieve almost any color in the visible range. Scientists promise that QLED matrices will have better color rendering, contrast, higher brightness and low power consumption. Quantum dot screen technology is partially used in Sony TV screens, and LG and Philips have prototypes, but there is no talk of mass use of such displays in TVs or smartphones yet.

It is also highly likely that in the near future we will see not just curved, but also completely flexible displays in smartphones. Moreover, prototypes of such AMOLED matrices almost ready for mass production have existed for a couple of years. The limitation is the electronics of the smartphone, which cannot yet be made flexible. On the other hand, large companies can change the very concept of a smartphone by releasing something like the gadget shown in the photo below - we can only wait, because the development of technology is happening right before our eyes.

TFT and IPS matrices: features, advantages and disadvantages

In the modern world, we regularly come across the displays of phones, tablets, PC monitors and TVs. Technologies for the production of liquid crystal matrices do not stand still, due to which many people have the question of what is better to choose TFT or IPS?

In order to fully answer this question, it is necessary to carefully understand the differences between both matrices, highlight their features, advantages and disadvantages. Knowing all these subtleties, you can easily choose a device whose display will fully meet your requirements. Our article will help you with this.

TFT matrices

Thin Film Transistor (TFT) is a liquid crystal display manufacturing system based on an active matrix of thin film transistors. When voltage is applied to such a matrix, the crystals turn towards each other, which leads to the formation of a black color. Turning off the electricity gives the opposite result - the crystals form white. Changing the supplied voltage allows you to form any color on each individual pixel.

The main advantage of TFT displays is the relatively low production price compared to modern analogues. In addition, such matrices have excellent brightness and response time. Thanks to this, distortion when viewing dynamic scenes is invisible. Displays made using TFT technology are most often used in budget TVs and monitors.

Disadvantages of TFT displays:

- low color rendering. The technology has a limit of 6 bits per channel;
- the spiral arrangement of crystals negatively affects the contrast of the image;
- image quality decreases noticeably when the viewing angle changes;
- high probability of “dead” pixels;
- relatively low power consumption.

The disadvantages of TFT matrices are most noticeable when working with black color. It can be distorted to gray, or, conversely, be too contrasty.

IPS matrices

The IPS matrix is an improved continuation of displays developed using TFT technology. The main difference between these matrices is that in TFT the liquid crystals are arranged in a spiral, while in IPS the crystals lie in the same plane parallel to each other. In addition, in the absence of electricity they do not rotate, which has a positive effect on the display of black colors.

Advantages of IPS matrices:

viewing angles at which image quality does not decrease have been increased to 178 degrees;
improved color rendering. The amount of data transmitted to each channel has been increased to 8 bits;
significantly improved contrast;
reduced energy consumption;
low probability of “broken” or burnt-out pixels.

The image on the IPS matrix looks more vibrant and rich, but this does not mean that this technology is without its shortcomings. Compared to its predecessor, IPS has significantly reduced image brightness. Also, due to changes in the control electrodes, such an indicator as the response time of the matrix suffered. The last but not least significant drawback is the relatively high price of devices that use IPS displays. As a rule, they are 10-20% more expensive than similar ones with a TFT matrix.

What to choose: TFT or IPS?

It is worth understanding that TFT and IPS matrices, despite significant differences in image quality, are very similar technologies. They are both created on the basis of active matrices and use liquid crystals of the same structure. Many modern manufacturers give their preference to IPS matrices. Largely due to the fact that they can provide more worthy competition to plasma matrices and have significant prospects in the future. However, TFT matrices are also evolving. Nowadays you can find TFT-TN and TFT-HD displays on the market. They are practically not inferior in image quality to IPS matrices, but at the same time they have a more affordable price. But at the moment there are not many devices with such monitors.

If image quality is important to you and you are willing to pay a little extra, then a device with an IPS display is the best choice.

Technology does not stand still, and the production of liquid crystal screens is no exception. However, due to the constant development and release of new technologies in the manufacture of screens, as well as due to special marketing approaches to advertising, many buyers when choosing a monitor or TV may have a question, which is better IPS or TFT screen?

To answer the question posed, you need to understand what IPS technology is and what a TFT screen is. Only knowing this will you be able to understand the difference between these technologies. This in turn will help you make the right choice of screen that will fully meet your requirements.

1. So, what is a TFT display?

As you may have guessed, TFT is an abbreviated name for the technology. It completely looks like this - Thin Film Transistor, which translated into Russian means thin-film transistor. Essentially, a TFT display is a type of liquid crystal screen that is based on an active matrix. In other words, this is a regular active matrix LCD screen. That is, the molecules of liquid crystals are controlled using special thin-film transistors.

2. What is IPS technology

IPS is also short for In-Plane Switching. This is a type of active matrix LCD display. This means that the question of which is better TFT or IPS is erroneous, since they are essentially the same thing. More precisely, IPS is a type of FTF display matrix.

IPS technology received its name due to the unique arrangement of electrodes, which are located on the same plane with the liquid crystal molecules. In turn, the liquid crystals are located parallel to the screen plane. This solution made it possible to significantly increase viewing angles, as well as increase the brightness and contrast of the image.

Today there are three most common types of active matrix TFT displays:

TN+Film;
PVA/MVA.

Thus, it becomes obvious that the difference between TFT and IPS is only that TFT is a type of LCD screen with an active matrix, and IPS is the same active matrix in a TFT display, or rather one of the types of matrix. It is worth noting that this matrix is the most common among users around the world.

3. What is the difference between TFT and IPS displays: Video

The common misconception that there is any difference between TFT and IPS has arisen due to the marketing gimmicks of sales managers. In an attempt to attract new customers, marketers do not disseminate complete information about technologies, which allows them to create the illusion that a completely new development is entering the world. Of course, IPS is a newer development than TN, but you cannot choose which TFT or IPS display is better for the reasons stated above.

For a number of reasons, liquid crystal screens are in great demand among users and are the most in demand in the domestic market. Modern LCD displays are divided into two types of matrices - IPS and TN. In this regard, many buyers have a question: what is better IPS or TN screen?

In order to understand which technology is better, you should consider all the advantages and disadvantages of IPS and TN screens. However, it is worth noting that both technologies have gone through a long path of development and improvement, which has made it possible to create screens of decent quality. Taking into account some technological features of technologies, depending on the situation, you should choose one or another screen.

When choosing a screen, there are several most important parameters to consider:

Screen resolution;
Color rendition;
Color saturation, contrast and brightness of the image;
Response time;
Energy consumption;
Durability.

1. TN vs IPS

First of all, you should pay attention to the screen resolution. This is one of the most important parameters that directly affects the image quality, as well as the diagonal size. To put it simply, resolution is the number of pixels on the screen vertically and horizontally. For example, a resolution of 1920x1080 means that the screen has 1920 pixels horizontally and 1080 pixels vertically. Accordingly, the higher the resolution, the higher the pixel density, and the clearer the image you can get.

It is worth understanding that modern technologies allow you to enjoy high-resolution video and photo images. Therefore, you should give preference to screens with maximum resolution. Today the highest resolution is 1920x1080 pixels (Full HD). Of course, such monitors or TVs will have a higher cost, but you will be able to fully experience all the benefits of technology.

If we talk about which matrix is better than TN or IPS in terms of resolution, then both technologies are equal. They can be either low or extremely high resolution, it all depends on the cost of the device.

2. Color rendering

Color rendering is a parameter that determines the number of colors and shades displayed by the screen. The saturation of colors, as well as the realism of the picture, depends on this. Modern technologies have made it possible to make screens with a fairly high level of color rendering, regardless of technology. However, there are some differences between IPS and TN screens.

2.1. Color rendition of IPS matrix

The features of this technology made it possible to create a screen with the most realistic colors. It is worth noting that IPS displays are in greatest demand among professional photo editors, as well as among those involved in image processing. This is explained by the fact that IPS monitors have the greatest color depth (black and white), as well as the largest number of displayed colors and shades - about 1.07 billion. This makes the image as realistic as possible.

In addition, IPS screens have the highest brightness and contrast, which also has a positive effect on image quality.

2.2. Color rendering of TN matrices

This type of matrix, although it has a high level of image quality, as well as excellent color rendition, is still significantly inferior to IPS screens. In addition, such matrices have smaller viewing angles.

If it says that TN Film or IPS is better in terms of color rendering, then the answer is clear - IPS matrices are significantly superior to TN+Film screens. Although, at home, any monitor will allow you to enjoy excellent quality and color depth.

3. Response time

This parameter determines the time during which a liquid crystal molecule is able to change its position to display from black to white and back. This is especially important for those who love bright and fast special effects and colorful games. If the response is slow, you will be able to observe an effect called “loop” on the screen. In other words, some shadow will be visible behind fast moving objects. In certain cases this may cause discomfort. Measures response in milliseconds.

3.1. IPS screen response

As mentioned above, IPS screens are famous for their excellent images, clarity and accuracy of the picture, as well as realistic color rendering, however, due to some features of the technology, such displays are inferior in response to TN matrices. Of course, this difference is insignificant and almost invisible at home, but it still exists, and for some it is very important.

It is worth noting that the most modern IPS matrices have a fairly fast response, but they are more expensive than TN+Film screens.

3.2. Response of TN matrices

This type of matrix has the fastest response, which makes such monitors most suitable for fans of games and 3D films with vivid special effects.

If we talk about which IPS or TN matrix is better in terms of response, then TN has an advantage. However, it is worth noting that at home all these advantages are insignificant. The choice depends entirely on personal preference.

4. So, which is better IPS or TN matrix

When choosing between these two technologies, you should take into account your personal requirements, as well as the purpose for which you are purchasing the monitor. Of course, there is an opinion that IPS matrices are a newer technology, and therefore better. However, in some situations the TN+Film matrix is a more suitable choice.

If we talk about which IPS or TN matrix is better for games, then preference should be given to TN+Film. TN monitors are lower cost and also have excellent response. Although, if you are not limited by your budget, then a monitor with an AH-IPS matrix will be the ideal choice for you, since such a monitor combines all the advantages of IPS and TN technologies.

It is worth noting that IPS matrices are slowly but surely replacing TN+Film screens. This is reflected in the fact that every year more and more manufacturers give preference to IPS screens. The advantages of IPS screens also include large viewing angles. Thanks to all the advantages, IPS screens are worthy competitors to plasma panels.