Intel core i7 processors table. Intel vs AMD processors: analysis and comparison of models

This article will compare laptop processors from two leading semiconductor manufacturers - Intel and AMD. The products of the first of them are equipped with an improved processor part and in this regard have a higher level of performance. In turn, AMD solutions boast a more powerful graphics subsystem.

Division into niches

Comparison and Intel for laptops would be best done in three niches:

• Budget-class processors (they are also the most affordable).
• Mid-level CPUs that combine both high speed and acceptable energy efficiency.
• Chips with maximum performance levels. In this case, performance, autonomy and energy efficiency fade into the background.

If in the first two cases AMD can provide a worthy alternative to Intel, then the latter company has reigned supreme in the premium segment for quite some time. The only hope in this regard is new processor solutions based on the Zen architecture, which AMD should present next year.

Entry-level Intel products

Until recently, this niche from Intel was occupied by products from the Atom line. But now the situation has changed and entry-level laptops are now based on processors. The most modest products in this class include only 2 cores, and the most advanced - 4. The following models are relevant for the 3rd quarter of 2016, which are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 - Current CPU models from Intel for entry-level mobile PCs.

There are essentially no fundamental differences between these CPU models. They are aimed at solving the simplest problems and have a minimum level of performance. Also, this manufacturer of semiconductor solutions has a strong point in the processor part, but the integrated graphics subsystem is very weak. Another strength of these products is the high degree of energy efficiency and the resulting improved autonomy.

Mid-range solutions from Intel

Core i3 and Core i5 are mid-range Intel processors for laptops. A comparison of their characteristics indicates that the first family is closer to entry-level solutions, and the second, under certain circumstances, can compete with the most productive chips of this company. Detailed specifications of this product family are given in Table 2.

Table 2 - Parameters of Intel processors for mid-range laptops.

The characteristics of CPUs of this class are almost identical. The key difference is the improved energy saving of the 7U54. As a result, autonomy in this case will also be better. Otherwise, there are no significant differences between these processors. The price for all chips of this family is the same - $281.

Premium processors for laptops from Intel

For the latest generation laptops, this indicates that the most powerful solutions include i7 family CPUs. Moreover, in architectural terms, they are practically no different from middle-class products. Even the video card models in this case are the same. But a higher level of performance compared to mid-range processors is provided by higher clock speeds and an increased size of Level 3 volatile memory. The main parameters of chips of this family are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 - Main characteristics of i7 family CPUs.

The difference between these products is that in the second case, energy efficiency is improved, but the performance will ultimately be lower.

AMD processors for entry-level mobile PCs

For laptops from the two leading manufacturers of these products, it indicates that Intel, as noted earlier, has a better processor part, while AMD has an integrated graphics subsystem. If the priority in a new laptop is an improved video system, then it is better to pay attention to laptops from a second manufacturer. Specific chip models with technical specifications are given in Table 4.

Table 4 - The latest AMD processors for entry-level laptops.

For the most part, these chips have almost identical technical parameters. The key difference here is only in the frequency range and the model of the integrated built-in accelerator. It is based on these parameters that you need to make a choice. If you need maximum autonomy, then we choose products with lower performance. If autonomy comes to the fore, then you will have to sacrifice dynamism for this.

AMD chips for organizing mid-range laptops

FX-9XXXP and A1X-9XXXP are for laptops. Comparison of their characteristics with entry-level products indicates that they already have 4 computing units versus 2, which are available in entry-level products. Also in this case it can be a worthy competitor to entry-level discrete accelerators. But the weak processor part is the factor today that significantly reduces the performance of laptops based on these chips. Therefore, you can only look in their direction if you need the fastest possible graphics subsystem at the minimum cost of a mobile computer. The main specifications of this CPU family are listed in Table 5.

Table 5 - AMD CPU parameters for mid-range laptops.

The hardest comparison to make between laptop processors is in the entry-level product segment. On the one hand, Intel solutions in this case have a lower cost and an improved processor part. In turn, AMD offers mobile PCs with an improved graphics subsystem. It is based on the last parameter that it is recommended to buy when choosing an entry-level laptop Pavilion 15-AW006UR from HP. All other things being equal to competing solutions, the video card in this case will have a certain performance margin, and the processor is not that much inferior to the Intel CPU. For a mid-level mobile PC, it is recommended to choose the Aspire E5 - 774 - 50SY from Acer. It has an i5 chip installed - 7200U, which is only slightly inferior to flagship products. And its other technical specifications are at an acceptable level, as for a middle-class laptop. A comparison of laptop processors in the niche of the most productive solutions indicated that it is best to purchase mobile computers based on the 7th generation i7 chips. The most affordable, but also very equipped laptop option is the IdeaPad 510-15 IKB from Lenovo. This is what is recommended to buy when choosing the most productive mobile PC. At the same time, the price is quite affordable for this class of devices, and the equipment is excellent.

Results

A comparison of laptop processors from two leading chip manufacturers today clearly and clearly indicates that in most cases the leading positions are occupied by products from Intel. AMD, in turn, lags significantly behind its direct competitor. The only market segment where parity is still maintained is entry-level mobile products, where AMD has a worthy alternative. In all other cases, it would be more correct to purchase laptops based on Intel CPUs. The current situation can be radically changed by the release of processors based on the Zen architecture in 2017. But whether AMD will be able to do this - time will tell. Now, in the niche of mid-level and premium mobile PCs, it is most correct to rely on solutions from Intel. Although their price is somewhat high, the level of performance more than compensates for this shortcoming.

Computers have entered our lives so tightly that we already consider them something elementary. But their structure cannot be called simple. Motherboard, processor, RAM, hard drives: all these are integral parts of the computer. You can’t throw away this or that detail, because they are all important. But the most important role is played by the processor. It’s not for nothing that they call it “central”.

The role of the CPU is simply enormous. It is responsible for all calculations, which means it depends on it how quickly you will complete your tasks. This could be surfing the web, composing a document in a word processor, editing photos, moving files and much, much more. Even in games and 3D modeling, where the main load falls on the shoulders of the graphics accelerator, the central processor plays a huge role, and with the wrong “stone” the performance of even the most powerful video card will not be fully realized.

At the moment, there are only two major processor manufacturers in the consumer market: AMD and Intel. We will talk about them in the traditional ranking.

The best inexpensive processors: budget up to 5000 rubles.

4 Intel Celeron G3900 Skylake

The most affordable Intel processor
Country: USA
Average price: 4,381 ₽
Rating (2019): 4.5

The rating opens with an extremely weak processor from the Celeron line. The G3900 model has two cores of the previous generation - Skylake, which, coupled with a frequency of 2.8 GHz, gives the lowest performance result. In synthetic tests, the processor shows a result that is approximately half that of the Core i3. But the price here is quite affordable - 4-4.5 thousand rubles. This means that this processor is perfect for assembling, for example, a simple office computer or a multimedia system for the living room. Overall, this model cannot be called bad. Still, the 14 nm process technology provides good energy efficiency, and the HD Graphics 510 graphics core is suitable for casual games.

Advantages:

• Lowest price in class
• Perfect for office PC or HTPC

Flaws:

• Does not support Hyper-Threading technology

3 AMD Athlon X4 845 Carrizo

Best price
A country:
Average price: 3,070 RUR
Rating (2019): 4.5

The processors of the Athlon line belong to the budget class, which is clearly evident from the cost of the bronze medalist. But for a little over three thousand rubles you will get a very interesting stone. There are 4 cores (2 logical cores for each physical) made using a 28 nm process technology. Thanks to this, power consumption is low, and heat dissipation is quite low for AMD - only 65 W. True, you don’t have to be particularly happy about this because the multiplier is locked - you won’t be able to overclock the processor. Another disadvantage is the lack of a built-in graphics core, which means that when assembling an office PC or multimedia system you will have to separately purchase a video card.

Advantages:

• Lowest price in class
• Great performance for the price

Flaws:

• Lack of built-in graphics core
• Unlocked multiplier

2 AMD FX-6300 Vishera

The only 6-core processor in its class
A country: USA (Produced in Malaysia, China)
Average price: 4,160 RUR
Rating (2019): 4.6

AMD's FX-6300 is the only processor in the category with six cores. Unfortunately, you can’t hope for high power in the budget class - the model is based on the 2012 Vishera core. In normal mode, the cores operate at a frequency of 3.5 GHz, but, like many AMD CPUs, it overclocks well. Yes, judging by user reviews, the performance is sufficient even for games, but there are still a lot of disadvantages.

One of the main ones is high energy consumption. Due to the use of inexpensive 32 nm process technology, AMD gets very hot and consumes a lot of electricity. We also note the lack of support for modern DDR4 RAM. Because of this, the processor can be recommended not for building a new PC, but for updating an old one without replacing the motherboard and other components.

Advantages:

• 6 cores. Perfect for performing several simple tasks at the same time.
• Good overclocking potential
• Low cost

Flaws:

• Poor energy efficiency
• Aging platform

At the moment there are only two players in the processor market - Intel and AMD. But this doesn’t make the choice any easier. To make the decision to purchase a CPU from one manufacturer or another easier, we have highlighted for you several main pros and cons of the products of these companies.

1 Intel Pentium G4600 Kaby Lake

Better performance
Country: USA
Average price: 7,450 RUR
Rating (2019): 4.7

We can recommend the good old Pentium for purchase in this category. This processor, like previous participants, is made using a 14 nm process technology, LGA1151 socket. Belongs to one of the latest generations - Kaby Lake. There are, of course, only 2 cores. They operate at a frequency of 3.6 GHz, which causes the lag behind the Core i3 by about 18-20%. But this is not much, because the price difference is twofold! In addition to the core frequency, the relatively low power is due to the small size of the L3 cache - 3071 KB.

In addition to the excellent price-performance ratio, the advantages of this CPU include the presence of a built-in Intel HD Graphics 630 graphics core, which is more than enough for comfortable use of a PC without a discrete video card.

Advantages:

• Great price for this performance
• Generation Kaby Lake
• Good integrated graphics core

The best mid-class processors: budget up to 20,000 rubles.

5 Intel Core i3-7320 Kaby Lake

The most affordable processor with integrated graphics
Country: USA
Average price: 12,340 RUR
Rating (2019): 4.6

Let's open the rating with the most affordable processor in the i-core line. It is extremely difficult to call the model excellent in terms of price/quality ratio, because the cheaper Ryzen 3 even shows slightly better results in synthetic tests. However, the model that opens the TOP 5 can be safely chosen not only for an office system, but also for a gaming computer.

There are only two physical cores, but these are modern 14 nm chips from one of the latest generations - Kaby lake. Frequency - 4100 MHz. This is a very shameful indicator. In addition, there is the possibility of overclocking. Considering the excellent energy efficiency and low heat generation - even with the included cooler, the temperature remains at 35-40 degrees when idle, and up to 70 degrees under load - you can safely increase the frequencies. Unlike competitors from AMD, the Core i3 has a built-in graphics core, which allows it to be used in an office system without a discrete graphics card. But keep in mind that officially it only works on Windows 10

Advantages:

• Built-in graphics core
• Overclocking capability
• Low temperatures

Flaws:

• Poor performance for the price

4 AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Summit Ridge

Best price
A country: USA (Produced in Malaysia, China)
Average price: 6,917 ₽
Rating (2019): 4.7

Ryzen 3 is a low-cost new line of AMD processors, designed to once again impose a fight on Intel. And the 1200 does the job perfectly. For 7 thousand rubles, the buyer receives a 4-core processor. Factory frequencies are low - only 3.1 GHz (in high performance mode 3.4 GHz), but the multiplier is unlocked, which means enthusiasts can easily make the “stone” a little faster.

The transition to new chips not only improved performance, but also reduced power consumption, and also reduced temperatures to acceptable values. Due to the lack of a built-in graphics chip, we can only recommend this processor for budget gaming builds. Productivity is only slightly higher than the previous participant.

Advantages:

• Unlocked multiplier

Flaws:

• No built-in graphics chip

3 Intel Core i5-7600K Kaby Lake

Great processor for gaming
Country: USA
Average price: 19,084 ₽
Rating (2019): 4.7

Let's start with the fact that the i5-7600K is by no means an outsider. Yes, in terms of performance it is somewhat worse than the mastodons that you will see below, but for most gamers it will be enough. The processor has four Kaby Lake cores operating at 3.8 GHz (in reality up to 4.0 GHz with TurboBoost). There is also a built-in graphics core - HD Graphics 630, which means you can play even demanding games at minimum settings. With a normal video card (for example, GTX 1060), the processor reveals itself completely. In most games with FullHD resolution (most gamers have these monitors) and high graphics settings, the frame rate rarely drops below 60 fps. Is anything else needed?

Advantages:

• Best price
• Enough power for most gamers
• Excellent graphics core

2 AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Summit Ridge

Best price/performance ratio
A country: USA (Produced in Malaysia, China)
Average price: 11,970 ₽
Rating (2019): 4.8

The second line of the TOP 5 mid-level processors is occupied by one of the best processors in terms of price/performance ratio. With an average cost of only 12,000 rubles, in synthetic tests Ryzen 5 is able to compete with the well-known Intel Core i7-7700K at standard settings (PassMark 12270 and 12050 points, respectively). This power is due to the presence of six Summit Ridge physical cores, made using a 12 nm process technology. The clock frequency is not a record - 3.6 GHz. Overclocking is possible, but in reviews users claim that at frequencies above 4.0-4.1 GHz the processor behaves unstable and gets very hot. With factory settings, idle temperatures remain at 42-46 degrees, in games 53-57 when using a standard cooler.

Also, high performance is due to large cache volumes at all levels. The CPU supports the modern DDR4-2667 standard, which allows you to create excellent computers based on this processor for gaming at medium-high settings in FullHD.

Advantages:

• Excellent price/performance ratio
• Heats up a little

Flaws:

• Low overclocking potential

1 AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Summit Ridge

The most powerful processor in its class
A country: USA (Manufactured in Malaysia, China, China)
Average price: 17,100 RUR
Rating (2019): 4.8

As expected, the processor from the top-line Ryzen 7 has the best performance in its class. Once again, we cannot help but remember the cost - for 17 thousand rubles we get power at the level of the top-end Core i7 of previous years. The processor includes eight cores, divided into two clusters. The standard clock speed is only 3.0 GHz, Ryzen 7 is guaranteed to overclock to 3.7, and with a little luck, up to 4.1 GHz.

Like previous representatives of the line, the leader is made using a 12 nm process technology, which allows for economical energy consumption. The situation with heat dissipation is good - in stress tests, temperatures remain at 70-75 degrees.

Advantages:

• High performance
• There is an overclocking option
• A fresh platform that will be supported for at least 4 years

The best top processors

3 Intel Core i7-7700K Kaby Lake

The most popular top processor
Average price: 29,060 ₽
Rating (2019): 4.6

More recently, the i7-7700K was the top processor in the Intel lineup. But technology is developing extremely quickly, and in 2018 it is difficult to recommend this particular chip for purchase. According to synthetic tests, the model clearly lags behind its competitors - in PassMark the CPU scores only 12 thousand points, which is comparable to modern mid-level processors. But these indicators are achieved on standard settings, when 4 physical cores operate at a frequency of 4.2 GHz, but the CPU can be easily overclocked to even higher frequencies, thereby increasing performance.

Yes, the bronze medalist lags behind its competitors, but it costs at least half as much, and given its popularity, it is quite possible to find a good used processor. Also, the high prevalence and long-standing presence on the market allows you to find an affordable motherboard with the LGA1151 socket. In general, we have an excellent basis for a powerful gaming system at a relatively low cost.

Advantages:

• Good price for this class
• High performance
• Great overclocking capabilities
• High popularity

Flaws:

• Not entirely relevant in 2018

2 Intel Core i9-7900X Skylake

The most powerful processor in the Intel line
Country: USA
Average price: 77,370 RUR
Rating (2019): 4.7

Until recently, Intel's top line was the Core i7 series. But modern realities require more and more power. If you are not familiar with solutions, pay attention to the Core i9-7900X. The processor, already at a standard clock frequency, is capable of entering the TOP 10 most powerful CPUs. For example, in PassMark the model scores almost 22 thousand points - this is twice as many as the bronze medalist of the rating. At the same time, in reviews, users talk about trouble-free overclocking to 4.2-4.5 GHz with high-quality air cooling. Temperatures do not exceed 70 degrees under load.

Such high performance is due to the use of 10 cores made using a 14 nm process technology. The model supports all the necessary modern standards and commands, which allows it to be used for any task.

Advantages:

• Highest performance
• Excellent overclocking potential
• Acceptable temperatures

Flaws:

• Very high cost
• No solder under the cap.

1 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

The leader of the rating is crazy in everything - from the price of 65 thousand rubles to the incredible performance. In terms of power in synthetic tests, the model is slightly ahead of the previous participant. The internal structure is significantly different. Threadripper uses 16 (!) cores. The clock speed is comparable to the Core i9 - 3400 MHz - but the overclocking capabilities are more modest. The “stone” operates stably at a frequency of 3.9 GHz; as rates increase, the necessary stability is lost.

Such a large number of cores performs well in all tasks. But using a monster for games is not entirely reasonable - not all projects can reveal its potential. AMD will be useful for professional video editors, 3D designers, etc. - in professional software, an increase in cores gives a noticeable increase in rendering speed.

Advantages:

• Relatively low price tag
• High power
• Excellent performance in professional programs

Intel is one of the two most popular companies developing processors for laptops and computers. Many gamers and other users consider this company to be the best and prefer its products. But Intel has a fairly wide range of models. So, figuring out which processor is best for which computer is sometimes not so easy. To make it easier for customers to navigate the wide range of offers from the manufacturer, we have created a rating of Intel processors. With it you can easily choose the processor to suit your taste.

No. 10 – Intel Pentium G4400

Price: 5745 rubles

And our top chipset begins, called the Intel Pentium G4400 - an excellent option for budget personal computers.

This processor is based on the Skylake architecture and consists of two cores clocked at 3.3 GHz. Additional performance of the device is provided by cache memory, the volume of which here is 3072 KB.

The Pentium G4400 is also capable of image processing. There is a built-in SkylakeIntel HD Graphics 510 graphics processor. Of course, it cannot completely replace a full-fledged video card, but it is enough to perform simple tasks.

This model has a special controller that supports two-way data transfer between the processor and RAM.

This controller is capable of working with memory modules up to 64 GB. So there shouldn’t be any problems installing the required amount of RAM.

Intel Pentium G4400

No. 9 – Intel Pentium G4620

Price: 7085 rubles

The Intel Pentium G4620 is a dual-core processor with a clock frequency of 3700 MHz. It is developed using 14nm process technology. The basis of this device is the Kaby Lake architecture.

This model has the same cache memory - 3 MB, but the graphics processor here is slightly more powerful than the HD Graphics 630. Of course, if we compare the Pentium G4400 and G4620, then the latter option is better, but not much. It is unlikely that you will notice a significant difference in performance.

However, the G4620 is an excellent processor that, of course, is not suitable for professional gamers, but may well satisfy the needs of the average user or lover of playing old games.

In general, it will cope with new games, but there will be slowdowns, and it won’t be possible to set the settings to maximum. If this is not a problem for you, then the G4620 is worth taking. Otherwise, it’s better to take a closer look at more expensive models.

Intel Pentium G4620

No. 8 – Intel Core i3-8300

Price: 12955 rubles

Having finished with the budget segment, let's move on to entry-level processors. Intel Core i3-8300 is already a quad-core processor with a clock frequency of 3.7 GHz. The cache memory here is also twice as large – as much as 8 MB.

The Core i3-8300 comes with an excellent cooler, which is actually rare for powerful processors. Usually, when you buy a really good processor, you definitely need to buy a cooling system for it, because the basic one, as a rule, is terribly insufficient to maintain normal operating condition. But in this case, the box cooler copes with its task quite well.

The Core i3-8300 is a good processor that, in conjunction with an equally good video card, can handle most modern games.

In addition, it is sold for a meager price, considering all its advantages. So, if you do not need the most powerful, but high-quality chipset, we recommend choosing the i3-8300.

Intel Core i3-8300

No. 7 – Intel Core i3-8350K

Price: 13100 rubles

Intel Core i3-8350K is an improved version of the previous model. Like the basic version, it has four cores and 8 MB of cache, but its clock speed is 4 GHz.

This is a fairly high figure that is guaranteed to provide you with high performance. The main advantage of the Core i3-8350K over the Core i3-8300 is the unlocked multiplier.

That is, the processor can also be overclocked. Thus, the already high clock frequency of 4 GHz can be increased to 4.6 GHz. This is a pretty good overclocking for Intel processors.

The Intel Core i3-8350K maintains adequate temperatures well. When actively working with a computer, you are unlikely to heat it above 50 degrees, which is simply an excellent indicator.

Without a doubt, in the Intel model table, this is one of the best processors in terms of price and quality.

Intel Core i3-8350K

No. 6 – Intel Core i5-8400

Price: 16575 rubles

The golden mean in the company's lineup is occupied by Core i5 chipsets. It includes fairly current, but still affordable processors. We'll start our review with the Intel Core i5-8400.

It's a six-core processor clocked at just 2.8 GHz, but that's only in standard mode. In turbo boost, when maximum performance is required, it accelerates to 4 GHz. The cache memory here is 9 MB.

The i5-8400 processor is quite popular, because it has six ultra-fast cores and is sold at a very decent price compared to older models.

Overall, this is a more than decent processor. The only downside is that it has sudden temperature fluctuations, but usually it does not heat up above 61 degrees. This model is more than enough for any modern games.

Intel Core i5-8400

No. 5 – Intel Core i5-8600

Price: 18990 rubles

The improved sixth-generation Intel Core i5-8600 six-core processor has a significantly higher clock speed. The base frequency is 3.1 GHz, but in turbo mode this figure increases to 4.3 GHz. Otherwise, the technical specifications are the same.

The undoubted advantage of the Core i5-8600 is that in some cases its performance can be equal to even the newest processor models from Intel.

There is also very little heat generation, which is quite good for such a powerful chip. In short, the i5-8600 is an excellent representative of the mid-price segment that will provide you with maximum performance even in new games.

Intel Core i5-8600

No. 4 – Intel Core i5-9600K

Price: 21,750 rubles

The Intel Core i5-9600K, being the most advanced model in the line, has again advanced by increasing the clock frequency. Here this figure is 3.7 GHz. And when turbo mode is activated, the processor accelerates to an incredible 4.6 GHz.

Core i5-9600K is the best current processor from Intel today. Then there are models for those who are greedily trying to accumulate as much power as possible for the years to come.

If you use an i5-9600K and a good graphics card, enough RAM and other adequate technical specifications, you should not have any problems with performance in modern games.

Intel Core i5-9600K

No. 3 – Intel Core i7-8700K

Price: 23615 rubles

So we moved on to the most powerful Intel line - Core i7. We will begin our consideration with such a model as the Core i7-8700K. There are the same number of cores as in previous models - 6, and the maximum clock speed is the same.

But the i7-8700K has a significantly increased amount of cache memory - 12288 KB. Also, a more powerful graphics core HD Graphics 630 at 1200 MHz was installed here.

12 threads provide a significant power reserve, thanks to which the Intel Core i7-8700K will be relevant for many years to come. The fact that if you have the appropriate video card, all modern games will run even on ultra settings is probably not worth mentioning, this is already clear.

Intel Core i7-8700K

No. 2 – Intel Core i7-9700K

Price: 34299 rubles

The Intel Core i7-9700K processor is based on an architecture codenamed Coffee Lake-R. It has 8 cores and is created according to the 14 nm technical process standard. The clock frequency of the processor cores is 3.6 GHz, and the cache memory is 12 MB.

Essentially, the Core i7-9700K repeats the previous model, but already contains 8 cores and 16 threads, which further increases the processor's power reserves.

With such a processor, you can not only play, but stream modern games in good quality. There is also an unlocked multiplier and, as a result, the ability to overclock the cores.

The only problem is the very high price, but you have to pay a lot for the power.

Intel Core i7-9700K

No. 1 – Intel Core i9-7960X

Price: 113,030 rubles

Here we come to the first place where the Core i9-7960X is located - this is the best latest generation processor from Intel to date.

It costs three times more than the previous model, but this is more than justified, because there are as many as 16 cores operating at a clock frequency of 2.2 GHz. In turbo mode, it is possible to overclock the frequency to 4.2 GHz. It is supported by a 22 MB cache memory.

If you have a lot of money, you can buy this processor and not worry about your computer not being able to handle anything for many years to come. But if you only need modern games, you can choose something cheaper.

Intel Core i9-7960X

Above are the best processor models from Intel. Among them, you can easily choose an option that will suit your needs and financial capabilities, because all the chips presented here are the best solutions for their price.

The result is banal: it is impossible to judge the performance of any central processor by only one parameter. Only a set of characteristics gives an understanding of what kind of chip it is. Narrowing down the processors to consider is very easy. AMD's modern ones include FX chips for the AM3+ platform and A10/8/6 hybrid solutions of the 6000 and 7000 series (plus Athlon X4) for FM2+. Intel has Haswell processors for the LGA1150 platform, Haswell-E (essentially one model) for LGA2011-v3 and the latest Skylake for LGA1151.

AMD processors

I repeat, the difficulty in choosing a processor lies in the fact that there are a lot of models on sale. You simply get confused in this variety of markings. AMD has hybrid processors A8 and A10. Both lines include only quad-core chips. But what's the difference? Let's talk about this.

Let's start with positioning. AMD FX processors are top chips for the AM3+ platform. Gaming system units and workstations are assembled on their basis. Hybrid processors (with built-in video) of the A-series, as well as Athlon X4 (without built-in graphics) are mid-class chips for the FM2+ platform.

The AMD FX series is divided into quad-core, six-core and eight-core models. All processors do not have a built-in graphics core. Therefore, for a complete build you will need either a motherboard with built-in video or a discrete 3D accelerator.

The quality and speed of operation of a personal computer, as well as its performance, largely depend on the processor. This becomes clearly clear when the PC refuses to cope with the tasks that the user sets for it. There is only one way out - to upgrade your computer and look for a new, more productive and modern processor. To ensure that the purchase does not turn out to be useless, you need to clearly understand how to choose a processor and what parameters it should have in order to cope with specific tasks. Similar problems arise for those who decide to assemble their own car. Let’s try to answer all the questions as briefly and succinctly as possible, as well as study the modern market and determine the best processors of 2018.

The main subject of debate when choosing a processor is the manufacturer. There are currently two companies competing in the market: AMDAndIntel. Arguments over whose products are better are reminiscent of the eternal debate about iOS and Android, or Canon and Nikon. Fans of this or that system are ready to tirelessly prove their point of view, but there is always an “arms race” between the companies themselves, so it is impossible to definitively answer which processors are better, AMD or Intel. Someone once said that this is like a matter of religion or even a matter of habit.

We will return to the manufacturer’s question and try to understand their proposals in more detail, but for now we note that when choosing a processor, you should still pay attention to its architecture, number of cores, clock frequency, cache memory size and other parameters.

Processor socket or socket type

The processor is installed in a special socket on the motherboard, so their socket type must match. Different types of connectors are incompatible with each other - a system assembled in this way will not work. Motherboard manufacturers indicate which processors a particular model is compatible with. Information is available in the instructions for the motherboard or on official websites. If you are assembling a computer yourself, then do not buy an outdated motherboard: in a couple of years, when you want to upgrade your PC, you will have to buy not only a new processor, but also a new motherboard.

There are up to 30 different types of sockets, many of them are already considered obsolete.

Intel processors are now available with the following sockets:

For processorsAMDThe following sockets are relevant:

• FM2/FM2+– inexpensive simple processors that are suitable for assembling ordinary office systems and simple gaming PCs;
• AM3+– one of the most common sockets, on its basis you can assemble systems of any power, up to the most advanced gaming computers;
• A.M.4 – socket for the most powerful processors, which are used to build professional and gaming PCs;
• A.M.1 – a socket for the simplest processors.

Sockets LGA1155, LGA775AM3, LGA2011, AM2/+ are considered obsolete.

Number of cores and threads

The core of a process is its heart, brain and soul. The first multi-core processor was introduced to the world by Intel, but there is still an opinion that the idea was stolen from AMD. Let's not bring up the past - the main thing is that today single-core processors can no longer be found. It remains to be figured out how many cores are actually needed.

If we simplify it a little, we can come to the following conclusions:

• 2 cores– an option for a computer that will be used to work with a basic set of office programs, launch a browser and watch videos;
• 4 cores– an option for both office use and for launching medium-sized toys. It all depends on the frequency and architecture;
• 6, 8 and 10 cores– powerful computers for running 3D programs and the most modern and demanding games. A good option for a gamer.

Please note that there are programs that cannot load balance across cores and will run faster on a 2-core processor with a higher clock speed than on a 4-core processor at a lower clock speed.

Please note that there is processors with virtual additional cores. Special technology (Hyper-Threading for Intel, or SMT for AMD) allows you to clone each physical core, That's why the number of data processing threads does not always equal the number of cores. If you are told about an eight-thread processor, then it may have 4 or 8 actual cores.

CPU frequency

Many users naively believe that the higher the clock speed, the better and faster the computer will work. This is not entirely true, or rather it is, but under certain conditions. Let's figure it out.

Clock speed refers to the number of operations a processor performs per second. Hence, the higher the frequency, the faster the “brains” work, and a 3.5 GHz processor will be preferable to a 2.8 GHz processor, for example. This is indeed true if we are talking about processors of the same line, where the same kernels are used.

Performance depends not only on the frequency, but also on the processor architecture and cache size, so you should not focus only on the frequency, but within the same line it is a significant factor.

Technical process

The technical process determines the size of the transistors on the processor and the distance between them. Photolithography is used to deposit conductors, insulators and other elements onto a silicon substrate. The resolution of the equipment used determines a certain technical process and affects the sizes of transistors and the distance between them.

The technical process is measured in nm and the smaller it is, the more elements can be placed in the same area. At the moment, the most modern processors have a 14 nm process technology.

This parameter has a very indirect effect on performance. It affects the heating of the processor much more significantly. Improvements in technology make it possible to release a processor each time with a lower technological process; they heat up less. If you compare an old generation processor and a new one with the same performance, the new one will heat up less. Since performance increases in new models, the old and new “stones” heat up approximately equally. Thus, reducing the technical process allows manufacturers to create ever faster and more productive processors without increasing their heat.

Cache memory

Cache is built-in, ultra-fast memory that helps store and process data across cores, RAM, and other buses. Essentially this is the link between RAM and processor. Thanks to this buffer, you can quickly access frequently used data. In modern processors, the cache has several levels (usually three, less often two). The larger the amount of memory on them, the faster the “stone” will work, but again this is only true for processors of the same line.

Memory is distributed unevenly across levels:

• L1 is first level cache, its volume is minimal (8-128 KB), but the speed is the highest. The frequency usually reaches the processor frequency level;
• L2 – second level cache, larger in volume (from 128 KB) than the first, but slower than it;
• L3 is the most capacious, but slowest cache. On the other hand, even the third level cache is faster than RAM

If you need to choose a processor for a gaming computer or to run powerful professional programs with high graphics requirements, then it is better to take processor with the maximum possible amount of third-level memory(the parameter usually ranges from 2 to 20 MB). This established truth has recently been destroyed by tests of new processors, which show that cache memory has virtually no effect on performance in games. However, this parameter should not be written off - a good amount of cache memory will speed up data archiving and writing data from flash memory to the hard drive.

Integrated graphics core

Improvements in production technology have made it possible to place various microcircuits inside the processor, incl. graphics core. The main advantage of this solution is that there is no need to buy a video card separately. Typically, video cards that are quite mediocre in terms of capabilities are built into the processor, so models with an integrated graphics core Suitable for users for whom graphics capabilities are secondary. These are budget processors for an office environment, but they can handle videos from the Internet, most non-specific programs, regular toys, and even entry-level 3D games.

If your goal is to build a powerful gaming computer, then it is better to take a processor without a built-in graphics core and then buy a powerful video card. Considering that it costs a lot, and many still have to save some time for it, a processor with a built-in video card can be useful in this case too.

What is processor bit depth, and is it so important?

The processor capacity shows how many bits the computer can process in one clock cycle. This setting affects performance. Currently the most commonly used processors are 32 and 64 bit, there are also 128-bit processors, but their segment is still very limited.

Is a 64-bit processor always better than a 32-bit processor, and what are the differences? If the processor has 2 cores and 2-3 GB of RAM is used, then you will not feel the difference. A 64-bit processor when using multi-core processors can significantly improve performance when running 64-bit applications. To be fair, it is worth noting that an increase in productivity will not always be noticeable.

The main advantageous difference between 64-bit processors– this is the ability to work with RAM of 4 GB or more. If you have even 8 GB of RAM in your computer, the 32-bit processor will see and use only 3.75 GB of them.

Heat dissipation

The more powerful the processor, the hotter it gets. It’s good that improving the technical process can significantly reduce heating. Today, the TDP value, W, is used to assess heat dissipation. The lower the value, the less heat generation. In laptop computers, everything is well calculated, installed and works without additional cooling. If you need to build a very powerful computer, then you will hardly be able to do without a cooler built into the processor (such models are marked as BOX, without a cooler - OEM).

If the TDP of the system 60 W or less, then even a complete or the simplest cooling system can be used. When heat is generated up to 95 W It’s better to take high-quality medium format fans – the kit ones won’t do the job. At TDP 125 W or more You can't do without a tower cooler with several copper pipes.

Unlocked multiplier

If you are going to overclock the processor, then make sure that this can be done using standard methods. It is important that the function of changing the multiplier is supported by the motherboard.

AMD or Intel – which is better?

There is no and cannot be an objective answer to this question. Thousands of pages on the Internet have been created on this topic; disputes sometimes turn into scandals with the use of obscene language - this is how users defend the products of their favorite manufacturer. Often, all these disputes resemble attempts to figure out which is better, pineapple or sausage - there cannot be a consensus here.

In some segments AMD is better, in others Intel is better, but often even these opinions are subjective, so when choosing, rely purely on your subjective opinion - we will not interfere with you. Well, for those who have not yet decided on their subjective opinion, we will present a few facts.

The competition between the two leaders is fierce, but it is believed that Intel produces more powerful processors that AMD cannot keep up with, and AMD, in turn, offers the best budget solutions. But this opinion is too generalized, since Intel also has good inexpensive processors, and AMD offers good top-end solutions. In terms of durability and reliability, the products of both companies are equal.

To decide which processor is better, AMD or Intel, you need to clearly determine your goals and answer the question of why the computer is being assembled. Moreover, the number of cores and frequency do not always determine performance - it’s all about completely different architecture. Therefore, use special sites where you can view test results, compare with analogues and see which tasks a particular processor copes best with.

We understand that we are touching on a very sensitive and controversial topic, but still, let’s talk about the common advantages of the processors of the two companies.

Advantages of processorsIntel:

• high performance and speed. Work with RAM is optimized better than that of AMD;
• a large number of games and programs that are optimized specifically for Intel;
• L2 and L3 cache often operates at higher speeds than on AMD processors;
• lower power consumption.

Disadvantages of processorsIntel:

• higher price;
• they are inferior to AMD processors in multitasking, despite the fact that they are superior when working with a single process;
• strong binding to specific sockets, so when buying a new process you will most likely have to change the motherboard.

Recently there was a real scandal. In processors from Intel it was detected vulnerability, which allows third-party malicious programs to gain access to the structure of a protected part of the kernel memory and discover where confidential information is stored. Our passwords, messages, photos and payment card data can be read and used by criminals. Fixing this problem and urgently updating the operating system will slow down computers by 20-30%. While the company was trying to resolve the conflict, it turned out that such There is also a vulnerability in processors fromAMD.

Advantages of processors fromAMD:

• affordable price, so many recognize the manufacturer’s processors as the best in terms of price/quality ratio;
• multitasking;
• multiplatform;
• The company's modern processors have good overclocking potential, so they are catching up with Intel in terms of performance.

Disadvantages of processors fromAMD:

The best processors of 2018

Best Intel Processors 2018

The kings of performance, Intel processors come in different price ranges. IN in the budget sector these are the Celeron and Pentium lines. By the way, in terms of performance they are superior to AMD processors of similar cost, but are inferior to them in multitasking. Processors suitable for entry-level gaming PCs and multimedia computers Core i3 , for more powerful ones - Core i5 , for the most powerful gaming – Core i7 .

Core i7-7700K

Despite the existence of more productive Core i7-6950X, Intel Core i7-7820X, Intel Core i9-7900X and some others, the Core i7-7700K can be considered the most balanced in terms of price and quality. The frequency is 4.2-4.7 GHz, there are 4 cores, there is a built-in video card, but it won’t be enough for top games, but it can easily handle running video in the highest resolution. Price about 400$.

Core i7-6950X Extreme Edition

It is obscenely expensive (about $1,700), is equipped with 10 cores, has 25 MB of third-level cache, has a frequency of 3 GHz, and supports Hyper-Threading technology. Power and strength! However, for assembling a gaming computer, the processor capabilities will be too much. This solution is only for those who use very specific and highly demanding programs, and even then it is possible to find a suitable solution at a cheaper price.

Core i5-7500

If you want to build a gaming PC, but the budget for purchasing a processor is modest, then a Core i5-7500 for $200 is a good solution. Performance and third-level cache (6 MB versus 8 MB) are almost as good as the Core i7-7700K, and if you have a good video card, the processor can handle any game. There is a built-in graphics core that supports 4K video. 4 cores operate at a frequency of 3.4-3.8 GHz.

Core i3-7100

Two cores, four threads, a frequency of 3.9 GHz and low power consumption combined with an affordable price ($110-170) make this processor a popular favorite. Users note that when using enough RAM and graphics memory, this processor can even handle games where the requirements include Core i5 and Core i7.

Pentium G4560

The processor has 2 cores, but 4 threads, frequency 3.5 GHz. The cost is about $70, so if you need to build an inexpensive gaming PC, then this is a good option. It cannot be compared with more expensive solutions, but if you have an appropriate video card, it will run modern games at minimum settings, older and less demanding games will generally fly.

Pentium Haswell

Not a bad option for an office PC. There are 2 cores, an integrated graphics processor, a frequency of 2.3-3.6 GHz. The volume of the third level cache is 3 MB. The heat generation is low. Cost about $85.

Celeron Skylake

A simple, inexpensive processor for computers designed to work with documents, browsers, and watch videos. Main characteristics: 2 cores, frequency 2.6-2.9 GHz, third level cache 2 MB, minimal heat dissipation, has a graphics core. Cost $45.

Best AMD processors 2018

Ruler budget processors – Sempron, Athlon, Phenom, A4 and A6. A8 and A10 can be used for multimedia and simple games, series FX– for middle-class gaming computers, and Ryzen These are top processors. You can purchase AMD processors on the website: potential buyers are presented with all the modern developments of AMD, as well as photographs of models, detailed lists of characteristics, brief descriptions and instruction manuals. To make it easier for you, we have selected several of the most interesting models suitable for different tasks.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

The honorable first place goes to the processor from the flagship Ryzen series – Threadripper 1920X. The 12-core “beast” with a clock frequency of 3.5-4 GHz simply could not remain outside our rating. An incredible 24 threads allow you to get the most out of your personal computer's performance. The processor is equipped with DDR4 memory (4 channels) with error correction function, which guarantees extremely high data transfer speeds. Cost about $990.

Ryzen 7 1800X

Second place also goes to the Ryzen representative – 7 1800X. This processor differs from the leader in the lack of virtualization technology, the number of cores (Ryzen 7 has eight) and, accordingly, threads (16), as well as RAM channels. There is support for an unlocked multiplier. This model is great for gamers - it runs 3D games and modeling programs even at maximum settings. Costs about $480.

Ryzen 5 1600X

The top three also includes the Ryzen 5 1600X, a strong rival to the competing Core i5 family. Its characteristics are, first of all, 6 cores/12 threads, Socket AM4 connector and two channels of RAM. Frequency – 3.6 GHz with the possibility of overclocking to 4 GHz. There is support for an unlocked multiplier. Costs about $260.

AMD A10-7860K

In fourth place is a powerful 4-core processor designed for home PCs and office use. Model with integrated graphics. Clock frequency – 3.6 GHz. It copes well with running games online (medium settings) with good performance and without overheating the hardware. Price about $100.

AMD FX-6300

A good alternative to productive solutions from Intel. The processor operates with 6 cores, has an unlocked multiplier, and a clock frequency of 3.5 GHz with the ability to overclock to 4.1 GHz. Socket – Socket AM3+. Performance is good, suitable for games and demanding applications, there is no built-in graphics core. Cost about $85.

Athlon X4 880K

The TOP model from the Athlon 880K family is closed – a 4-core processor for home PCs. The clock frequency of the model is 4.0-4.2 GHz. When paired with a Radeon Athlon 880K video card, it delivers excellent performance and demonstrates all the positive qualities of AMD products. Cost $84.

There is also a more budget-friendly solution from this series. The Athlon X4 860K runs on 4 cores, 3.7 GHz, but there is no integrated graphics core. Cost $45.

You can still write a lot, argue for a long time, argue, test and reflect. We’ll wrap it up here and leave you alone with your thoughts.