AMD processors. New Celeron and Sempron processors: fast and cheap More recent solutions


To test Socket 754 processors, we chose the Epox EP-8NPA-SLI motherboard.

This motherboard was one of the first to offer the nForce 4 chipset for this socket.

Board: Epox EP-8NPA-SLI (nVidia nForce 4 SLI)
Memory: single channel DDR400 (PC3200)

When the Athlon 64 was announced, three versions of processors for Socket 754 were announced: the original Clawhammer core with 1 MB of L2 cache; the same core with the cache halved; as well as the Newcastle core with 512 KB L2 cache and a smaller die surface area. In early 2005, Sempron joined them with an L2 cache of only 256 KB.

All Socket 754 processors operate with a single-channel DDR400 memory interface, resulting in a practical maximum transfer speed of 3 GB/s. At the same time, memory capacity greater than 1 GB is often problematic to install. The processors operate with a 200 MHz Hyper Transport channel, a maximum thermal dissipation of 89 W, and a clock frequency that varies from 1.8 GHz to 2.4 GHz. There are no plans to further increase the frequency for this socket. Available chipsets include nVidia nForce 3 150/250, VIA K8T800 and SIS's 755FX.


Socket 754 is equipped only with a single-channel memory interface. Therefore, problems arise when expanding memory.


Open AMD Athlon64 3400+ with core size 17.5 x 11.5 mm.


With the release of the Athlon64 3700+, Socket 754 fell into oblivion after two years of existence.

Socket 754: AMD Athlon64, Sempron
Board: Asus K8N-E Deluxe (nForce 3 250 GB)
Memory: DDR400 (PC3200)

Modern processors of the Sempron series, intended for the budget segment of the market, differ from full-fledged prototypes - Athlon 64 processors - in the volume of second-level cache reduced to 128 (or, in some models, up to 256 KB).

In addition, the HyperTransport bus in Sempron processors operates only at a frequency of 800 MHz, while in the Athlon 64 its frequency can reach 1000 MHz. Less significant is the lack of support for Pacifica virtualization technology.

Everything else, including a dual-channel memory controller, support for the 64-bit AMD64 architecture and the SSE3 instruction system, is available in full.

At the same time, we should not forget that such sophisticated Sempron processors are produced mainly in versions for Socket AM2 and Socket 939.

Older Sempron models for Socket 754, for example, only have a single-channel memory controller.

AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin Edition 19.9.2 Optional Driver

The new AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin Edition 19.9.2 Optional driver improves performance in Borderlands 3 and adds support for Radeon Image Sharpening technology.

Windows 10 Cumulative Update 1903 KB4515384 (Added)

On September 10, 2019, Microsoft released a cumulative update for Windows 10 version 1903 - KB4515384 with a number of security improvements and a fix for a bug that broke Windows Search and caused high CPU usage.

Driver Game Ready GeForce 436.30 WHQL

NVIDIA has released a Game Ready GeForce 436.30 WHQL driver package, which is designed for optimization in the games: Gears 5, Borderlands 3 and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, FIFA 20, The Surge 2 and Code Vein" fixes a number of bugs seen in previous releases and expands the list of G-Sync Compatible displays.

AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 19.9.1 Edition Driver

The first September release of AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 19.9.1 Edition graphics drivers is optimized for Gears 5.

Question: What are the marking features of AMD processors?
Answer: The marking of AMD processors is called OPN (Ordering Part Number). At first glance, it is quite complex and more like a kind of cipher, although if you understand it, you can get quite detailed information about their main technical parameters:

  1. The first two letters indicate the processor type:
    • AX - Athlon XP (0.18 µm);
    • AD - Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX, Athlon 64 X2;
    • SD - Sempron.
  2. The third letter indicates the TDP of the processor:
    • A - 89-125 W;
    • O - 65 W;
    • D - 35 W;
    • H - 45 W;
    • X - 125 W.
  3. For Sempron processors, the third letter has a slightly different meaning:
    • A - Desktop;
    • D - Energy Efficient.
  4. The next four numbers are the processor rating (the same one that is indicated in all price lists along with the processor type, for example, Athlon 64 4000+) or, in other words, the Model Number. It is a number that (from AMD's point of view) characterizes the performance of a given CPU in abstract units. Although there are some exceptions - in Athlon 64 FX processors, for example, instead of rating numbers, the letter index “FX (model index)” is indicated.
  5. The first letter of the three-letter index indicates the type of processor case:
    • A - Socket 754;
    • D - Socket 939;
    • C - Socket 940;
    • I - Socket AM2;
    • G - Socket F.
  6. The second letter of the three-letter index indicates the supply voltage of the processor core:
    • A - 1.35-1.4 V
    • C - 1.55 V;
    • E - 1.5 V;
    • I - 1.4 V;
    • K - 1.35 B;
    • M - 1.3 B;
    • Q - 1.2 V;
    • S - 1.15 V.
  7. The third letter of the three-letter index indicates the maximum temperature of the processor core:
    • A - 71°C;
    • K - 65°C;
    • M - 67°C;
    • O - 69° C;
    • P - 70°C;
    • X - 95° C.
  8. The next number indicates the size of the second level cache (total for dual-core processors):
    • 2 - 128 KB;
    • 3 - 256 KB;
    • 4 - 512 KB;
    • 5 - 1024 KB;
    • 6 - 2048 KB.
  9. The two-letter index indicates the type of processor core:
    • AX, AW - Newcastle;
    • AP, AR, AS, AT - Clawhammer;
    • AK - Sledge Hammer;
    • BI - Winchester;
    • BN - San Diego;
    • BP, BW - Venice;
    • BV - Manchester;
    • CD - Toledo;
    • CS, CU - Windsor F2;
    • CZ - Windsor F3;
    • CN, CW - Orleans, Manila;
    • DE - Lima;
    • DD, DL - Brisbane;
    • DH - Orleans F3
    • AX - Paris (for Sempron);
    • BI - Manchester (for Sempron);
    • BA, BO, AW, BX, BP, BW - Palermo (for Sempron).

For example, the AMD Sempron 3000+ processor (Manila core) is labeled as SDA3000IAA3CN. But nothing lasts forever in our world, and AMD is soon going to rename its processor lines, introducing a new, much more descriptive alphanumeric scheme. The new system assumes, along with the traditional brand and class designation, an alphanumeric model code

Brand Class Model
Phenom FX -
Phenom X4 GP-7xxx
Phenom X2 GS-6xxx
Athlon X2 BE-2xxx
Athlon X2 LS-2xxx
Sempron - LE-1xxx
  1. The first character in the processor model name determines its class:
    • G - High-end;
    • B - Mainstream;
    • L - Low-End.
  2. The second character determines the processor's power consumption:
    • P - more than 65 W;
    • S - 65 W;
    • E - less than 65 W (Energy Efficient class).
  3. The first digit indicates that the processor belongs to a specific family:
    • 1 - single-core Sempron;
    • 2 - dual-core Athlon;
    • 6 - dual-core Phenom X2;
    • 7 - quad-core Phenom X4.
  4. The second digit will indicate the performance level of a specific processor within the family.
  5. The last two digits will determine the processor modification.

Thus, the latest dual- and quad-core processors will be designated as AMD Phenom X2 GS-6xxx and Phenom X4 GP-7xxx. Economical mid-class dual-core processors are Athlon X2 BE-2xxx, and budget AMD Athlon and Sempron will be called Athlon X2 LS-2xxx and Sempron LE-1xxx. And the notorious number 64, indicating support for 64-bit architecture, will disappear from the name of the Athlon processor.

Question: How do Sempron processors differ from Athlon 64 processors?
Answer: Modern processors of the Sempron series, intended for the budget segment of the market, differ from full-fledged prototypes - Athlon 64 processors - in the volume of the second level cache reduced to 128 (or, in some models, up to 256 KB). In addition, the HyperTransport bus in Sempron processors only operates at 800 MHz, while in the Athlon 64 its frequency can reach 1000 MHz; Less significant is the lack of support for Pacifica virtualization technology. Everything else, including a dual-channel memory controller, support for the 64-bit AMD64 architecture and the SSE3 instruction system, is available in full.

At the same time, we should not forget that such sophisticated Sempron processors are produced mainly in versions for Socket AM2 and Socket 939. Older Sempron models for Socket 754, for example, have only a single-channel memory controller.

Question: What are the features of the Socket AM2 processor socket?
Answer: Today in the desktop segment, AMD is experiencing an “orgy”, when you can find processors on sale in at least four (!) variants: Socket 754, Socket 939, Socket 940 and Socket AM2 (and this is not to mention the rare Socket A, which are still occasionally found on store shelves). True, AMD came to its senses in time and with the release of the Socket AM2 platform, it again returned to the path of unifying the processor socket for desktops, for which it has always been respected by upgrade lovers.

Socket AM2, which will replace Socket 754 and Socket 939, has 940 pins (like the server Socket 940, but they are not compatible!), and is used in mass-produced single- and dual-core Athlon 64 processors, prestigious Athlon 64 FX and budget Sempron. Socket AM2 processors work with DDR2 memory with frequencies from 533 to 800 MHz (PC4200, PC5300 or PC6400) in dual-channel mode; Registered and ECC memory are not supported. Otherwise, AMD processors for Socket AM2 are completely identical to processors for Socket 939, the production of which is currently discontinued.

Question: Is AMD's future platform for Socket AM2+ and Socket AM3 compatible with existing solutions?
Answer: In the near future, we expect another transition to a new type of memory - DDR3 (see FAQ on DDR3. In accordance with AMD's plans, at the beginning of 2008, the modern Socket AM2 will be replaced first by Socket AM2+, and then by Socket AM3. The only serious The difference between Socket AM2 and Socket AM2+ will be the introduction of support for the new high-speed HyperTransport 3.0 bus. Its use will significantly increase the processor-chipset bandwidth (as well as processor-processor in the case of multiprocessor solutions). Socket AM3 processors will also gain support for the new DDR3 memory. The characteristic features of the new platforms compared to the modern Socket AM2 are given in the table:

Connector Socket AM2 Socket AM2+ Socket AM3
Number of contacts 940 940 940
Memory support DDR2 DDR2 DDR2, DDR3
HyperTransport version 1.0 3.0 3.0
release date May 2006 3 sq. 2007 3 sq. 2008

In this regard, the question inevitably arises about the compatibility of promising AMD platforms with existing ones.

So, Socket AM2 and Socket AM2+ processors and motherboards will be fully compatible with each other. Of course, if you install a new CPU with HT 3.0 support in Socket AM2, it will communicate with the chipset at the speed of the old HT 1.0. Socket AM3 processors, thanks to their memory controller that works with both DDR2 and DDR3 memory, will be the most versatile and can be installed in Socket AM3, Socket AM2+ and Socket AM2 motherboards (providing the latter platform with a very decent service life). But they will not have backward compatibility - neither Socket AM2 nor Socket AM2+ processors can be installed in Socket AM3 boards.

Question: What is Cool"n"Quiet?
Answer: Energy-saving Cool"n"Quiet technology came to AMD desktop processors from the mobile sector and allows you to reduce heat generation and power consumption when they are not fully loaded. At the moment, this technology is implemented in all processors of the AMD K8 family - Athlon 64, Athlon 64 X2, Athlon 64 FX, Sempron. Naturally, the motherboard must also support this technology (the corresponding item must be activated in the BIOS).

There is nothing radically new in Cool"n"Quiet technology. During operation, the operating system monitors the processor load, and if it is less than a certain threshold, the operating frequency and supply voltage of the processor are reduced. Reducing the operating frequency of the processor is carried out by reprogramming its registers (using a special program - the processor driver). By lowering the frequency and voltage, the processor will consume much less power, heat up less and, if the cooler is equipped with a thermal control system, the system noise will decrease.

When the processor load increases, everything happens along the same chain (OC-driver-processor-cooler), but vice versa - the processor will return to the nominal frequency. There can be up to a hundred such switches between different modes per second; for user programs, all this happens completely unnoticed, and even if it affects the overall performance of the Cool"n"Quiet system, it is insignificant.

The user determines the degree of system response to changes in processor load by selecting one or another policy in the Windows Power Options applet - from the minimum level (switching to power saving mode only when idle) to severe energy saving (the processor will almost always be in a state of reduced power consumption).

A processor from the cheap Celeron D series (Sempron) is a tempting offer. Despite being slightly reduced? Compared to more expensive versions, the characteristics of these processors ensure smooth operation of basic applications and even some new games.

Sempron processors appeared on the market only a few months ago and are still relatively unknown to most users. Therefore, it is worth recalling what AMD Sempron is and how it differs from the Athlon XP and Athlon 64 series crystals.

The situation with AMD's Sempron processors is similar to that with Intel's Celeron D. The same series includes different versions of crystals with different connectors. Most of the new models are processors with Socket A sockets, that is, the old Athlon XP on the Thoroughbred core. Owners of Athlon processors based on the Barton core can rest easy - their chips are faster, as they are characterized by a large amount of cache memory. Sempron processors operate on a relatively free 333 MHz system bus (similar to the EV6 bus in Athlon processors) and, like the Celeron D, have 256 KB of L2 cache. The maximum core voltage is 1.6 V.

As you can see, these crystals are quite compatible with the main models of motherboards equipped with a Socket A connector and a 333 MHz system bus. The only requirement (applicable to older board models) is a new BIOS version that correctly recognizes new AMD processor models. The use of Athlon XP architecture in Sempron Socket A processors in the future makes it possible to design cheaper models. Therefore, if you buy a cheap Sempron, you can count on increasing the frequency of its system bus and, therefore, achieving higher performance. Unfortunately, the cache memory will remain small.

Athlon 64 with abbreviations

So far, the only completely new design in the Sempron series is the AMD model 3100+ with Socket 754. The main elements of the architecture of this crystal are borrowed from the Athlon 64. Unfortunately, 64-bit instructions are blocked in it, and the cache size is reduced to 256 KB .

The processor uses a single-channel DDR400 memory controller, an SSE2 multimedia instruction set, and an advanced input data processing algorithm. True, it lacks the built-in NX-bit function, which, in combination with the Windows XP operating system (with Service Pack 2), provides a high level of anti-virus protection for your computer.

Sempron 3100+ is made using 0.13 micron technology. But, since all versions of Athlon 64 are manufactured using modern 0.09 micron technology, this improvement will probably reach this model soon.

When buying a Celeron, you should pay special attention to the model. Despite the similarity of names, the equally affordable Celeron and Celeron D differ quite significantly: the model with the D index is based on the Prescott architecture.

The latest Celeron models are manufactured using 0.09 micron technology. According to the specifications (see table), these models can use Socket 478 or LGA775 connectors. They are equipped with 256 KB of second-level cache (twice as much as models without the D index, as the first P4 models on the Willamette core had).

The system bus of D models operates at a clock frequency of 533 MHz (regular Celerons have 400 MHz). A significant new feature was the implementation of SSE3 functions borrowed from P4 Prescott. However, Celeron D processors do not support hyperthreading.

Decoding the index "J"

The letter "D" is not the only difference in the name. A few months ago, “J” also appeared. All Intel processor models with a "J" in the name implement XD-bit technology (aka NX-bit) to control the execution of program code.

XD-bit technology provides the processor with enough memory to verify application code to decide whether the code can be executed. If a virus or worm tries to add its code to the buffer, the processor will delay its execution. Intel has decided to implement XD technology for all types of processors. Previously, these functions were used in server systems and were intended for workstations. Today the turn has come to desktop and portable systems.

AMD Sempron 3100+

This model from a series of inexpensive processors works correctly with most applications.

Advantages:

high performance
  • modern architecture
  • Athlon 64 compatible connector
  • Flaws:

    • lack of NX-bit support
    AMD Sempron processors have replaced inexpensive Duron processors, which have received well-deserved recognition among the general consumer. However, most of the new Sempron processors are old Athlon Thoroughbreds under a new name.

    These dies use Socket A connectors and a 333 MHz system bus. In terms of performance, they are clearly inferior to the older Athlon XP Barton, which AMD still offers to consumers. Although the previously described Sempron 3100+ is usually classified as belonging to the same group of inexpensive processors, its design is completely different and has much in common with the Athlon 64. This crystal uses the Socket 754 connector. Thus, having purchased a board of this type, over time it will be possible to replace the Sempron with full-fledged Athlon 64 with the same socket.

    64 bits? Why not!

    The only significant difference between the Sempron 3100+ and the Athlon 64 is that the Sempron 3100+ is 32-bit. However, in terms of internal architecture, the Sempron 3100+ is as close as possible to the top category models. The integrated memory controller, although single-channel, does not introduce large delays in interaction with the computing module. This ensures fairly high performance. The limited amount of cache memory slightly reduces performance, but does not have a noticeable effect on the speed of most applications.

    Apart from the relatively low clock speed, barely reaching 1.8 GHz, the main representative of the new series of AMD crystals in most tests is not much inferior to the fastest processor tested - the Celeron D, whose clock speed exceeds the frequency of the Sempron 3100+ by 1 GHz.

    Intel Celeron D 340J

    A fast modern processor with hardware anti-virus protection, but it is difficult to find an inexpensive motherboard for it.

    Advantages:

    • high performance
    • possibility of upgrade
    • XD-bit support

    Flaws:

    relatively high price
    As competitors' processors developed and prices for Athlon XP fell, it became increasingly difficult for Celeron processors to compete for buyers. And then Intel took an extraordinary maneuver: it significantly improved the design of cheaper processors, which from an architectural point of view resemble P4 and are made using 0.09 micron technology.

    The Celeron D 340J processor is characterized by a clock frequency of 2.93 GHz. Its high performance is ensured by a high-speed system bus operating at a frequency of 533 MHz, as well as second-level cache memory, the volume of which has been doubled (from 128 to 256 KB) compared to its predecessors that do not have the letter D in the name.

    With the heart of Prescott

    Among other things, Celeron D received the latest SSE3 multimedia instruction set, which is also used in P4 processors on the Prescott core. Because this processor features state-of-the-art technology and a low core voltage (1.35V), it is an ideal starting point for future upgrades. It handles high-clocked buses effortlessly, allowing you to achieve the performance of P4 series models at a much higher price point.

    Compared to competitors in the AMD series, the Celeron D 340J has a serious advantage - it supports XD-bit technology (Intel's brand name for NX-bit technology), which at the hardware level increases the computer's security against virus attacks.

    In testing, the Intel processor proved to be somewhat weaker than the slower Sempron 3100+. The reason for this, among other things, may be Sempron's built-in RAM controller, which significantly improves performance.

    Intel Celeron D 335

    Relatively cheap processor, compatible with inexpensive components.

    Advantages:

    • high performance
    • Compatible with cheap motherboards
    • good prospects for upgrade

    Flaws:

    • lack of XD-bit support
    In testing, the 335 demonstrated the highest performance in the Celeron D series. This processor uses the widely used Socket 478, which so far has more advantages than LGA775. For most consumers, the most significant thing will be the ability to install the processor on cheap and high-quality motherboards with a Socket 478 socket, which are now filling the market. I’m also pleased with the opportunity to keep a video card with an AGP interface when upgrading. This allows you to build a much cheaper computer than using the LGA775 connector - with the same performance, but, however, without hardware support for XD-bit.

    Kernel unchanged

    This processor is also based on the Prescott core and is made using 0.09 micron technology, which suggests its further improvement.

    The test results showed that the Celeron D 335J, with the same clock speed as the D335, performs significantly better. The reason is, in particular, the use of a different test configuration, with faster DDR 533 MHz memory. However, there are also disadvantages to this, since RAM modules of this type are usually very expensive. But on the Celeron D Socket 478 processor you can build an inexpensive computer - and the user will have no reason to complain about its operation. However, it might be worth considering purchasing the slightly more expensive but also faster Sempron 2800+ model. On it, like on an Intel processor, you can build a productive PC without spending a fortune on it, since the choice of motherboards for Sempron 2800+ is also very wide. Anyone who in the future wants to replace the Sempron with an Athlon XP with a large amount of internal memory will be able to buy this processor without much hassle.

    AMD Sempron 2200+

    The processor is from a relatively inexpensive series and works correctly with most applications.

    Advantages:

    • low price
    • relatively high performance
    • availability of cheap motherboards

    Flaws:

    • outdated design
    The design of the processor, which according to test results turned out to be the most effective in terms of price/performance ratio, is not so new as to be a source of special pride for AMD. However, despite the average performance, Sempron 2200+ has many advantages. If the motherboard manufacturer remembers to update the BIOS, the Sempron 2200+ will run smoothly on any Socket A board with a 333 MHz FSB. But even without a new BIOS, the board parameters can be configured manually - and the processor will work correctly. The only problem with such a forced installation of a processor may be a lack of information about this model.

    During testing, Sempron 2200+ showed very good performance - only 80-90% of the leader of our review, Sempron 3100+. Quite a bit, if you remember the difference in price of these models.

    Don't play? Buy Sempron

    Of course, games are not the only class of applications that require high processor processing power. However, a user who takes the risk of buying a processor for $55 is unlikely to race the computer until they sweat.

    Sempron 2200+ is ideal for most common applications. In a free minute, the user can play, even the latest games with three-dimensional graphics, although here a lot depends on the speed of the graphics subsystem. The Sempron 2200+ justifies itself as a processor for a modern desktop computer. Cheap motherboards and other components allow you to build a computer with an ideal price/performance ratio.

    conclusions

    A test of processors that are not among the limited number of speed leaders is no less interesting than a competition between speed giants. Still, most users can afford cheaper models.

    Processor Specifications

    In the struggle for the title of manufacturer of the fastest processor, AMD and Intel have reached the point where their series of cheap processors began to resemble devices for a more demanding consumer.

    Test results

    Along with processors, Intel offers LGA775 sockets and hopes to attract buyers with XD-bit hardware anti-virus protection. Not a single Sempron is equipped with this function, although technologically this series (at least the 3100+ model) is quite ready for this. However, AMD did not dare to take such a step - most likely, fearing a drop in demand for models of the AMD 64 series. When the 64-bit version of Windows appears, the demand for 64-bit models will increase, AMD will certainly unlock so far hidden functions - and the new Sempron there will be additional benefits. However, even without NX-bit, Sempron processors are very attractive, not only because of their relatively low price, but also because of their high performance.

    Apart from the "average 64-bit" Sempron 3100+, these models are certainly not the latest, but they are quite fast enough to handle most computing tasks performed by typical applications on home and office PCs. When choosing a processor model, you should also pay attention to the type of connector. This issue needs to be considered from two perspectives: firstly, from the point of view of the availability of inexpensive compatible components, and secondly, taking into account the possibility of further upgrading the platform. Depending on your plans for the future, you have to decide: choose a cheaper, but unpromising option, or rely on a modern and significantly more expensive platform.

    There are enough connectors

    The average PC user is already tired of the abundance of processor connectors, to put it mildly. Processor manufacturers change them with a systematicity worthy of better use. Unfortunately, recently we are increasingly faced with the fashion for changing the connector, which is explained by technological requirements. But changing the connector inevitably entails replacing the processor and motherboard, and often also RAM and video cards!

    Sempron AMD processors, depending on the version, are installed in two types of sockets: Socket A (the same as for Athlon XP and Duron) or Socket 754 (as for Athlon 64 with the same type of socket). Celeron D also comes in two versions: Socket 478 (as for older P4 models) and Socket T (aka LGA775, for newer Intel processors made using 0.09 micron technology).

    Which connector should I choose?

    If we are talking about AMD, there are no problems. For the fast Sempron 3100+, it is better to choose the more promising Socket 754. Despite the fact that AMD is gradually moving to Socket 939, Athlon 64 processors with the same socket as Sempron are still widespread. An additional advantage of the latter is a wide selection of inexpensive motherboards.

    Not everything is so simple with Intel's new generation platform. LGA775 boards are expensive, and the new i915 and i925X/XE chipsets require a PCI Express graphics card. However, you can buy an inexpensive motherboard with a Socket 478 connector. Unfortunately, such connectors are gradually falling out of use. In addition, the Celeron D processor with the mentioned type of socket does not have the XD-bit function.

    Athlon 64 X2 is outdated, both physically and mentally. Such devices
    were presented back in 2006. These were the first multi-core solutions
    AMD company. Assessing their importance today is not particularly difficult. Their release was the first evolutionary step of this manufacturer in the field of high-tech solutions. It was he who significantly influenced the development of the computer industry. Nowadays you won’t surprise anyone with an 8-core CPU. This has already become the norm. But then such a decision produced a kind of revolution, the fruits of which we still enjoy to this day.

    Story

    The first 2-core CPU in the home PC niche was the product of AMD's eternal competitor, Intel. It was a Pentium processor with the index XE 840. It was installed in which was the main one for this manufacturer at that time. The increase in the number of cores has caused the need to reduce this, resulting in decreased performance in single-threaded applications. A similar result was obtained by the product of its constant competitor - the AMD Athlon 64 X2 processor. But due to the fact that such solutions were initially oriented towards multi-threading, the effect was not as strong as that of the main competitor. With the emergence of software that is capable of fully loading two physical cores, the balance of power gradually changed. And such solutions gradually replaced CPUs with 1 core from use. Yes, such devices are still sold now, but they are mostly used for office PCs, where work in office applications and the low cost of the finished system come to the fore. And for gaming systems it is recommended to take 4, 6 or 8 cores. As a last resort, you can opt for 2 cores, but this will significantly affect the quality of the game and not for the better. This arrangement was laid out more than 5 years ago, and one of its founders was the AMD Athlon 64 X2 processor.

    Modifications

    Initially, such CPUs were installed in which was the most progressive from this manufacturer at that time. 4 processor models were immediately presented. The youngest of them was the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200. The rest had a similar name, but differed in index. Modifications 4400, 4600 appeared, and the flagship of this line had the index 4800. Also, a mandatory attribute of the designations of these CPUs was “+”, which was added at the end of the name. The frequency of the base model was 2200 MHz. Also among the architectural features it is worth noting the cache, the size of which in the younger model was 1MB. Moreover, each of the cores accounted for only half of it. Other modifications boasted higher frequencies and larger cache sizes.

    Later decisions

    A little later, more productive products appeared on the market. A logical development in this direction was the emergence of such CPUs for the AM2 platform. Their cache size was similar to that of their predecessor. But the frequencies increased significantly and amounted, for example, for the CPU of the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000 model to 2700 MHz. Also another innovation was support for new memory, which was called DDR2. But, in principle, these processors, the period between the appearance of which is slightly less than 2 years, have a lot in common.

    Conclusion

    The AMD Athlon 64 X2 processor is one of the founders of the era of parallel computing on a single chip. If you look closely at it, you can easily find a lot in common with new AMD solutions. And there is nothing surprising here, because they are built according to a similar architecture, which over the past 5 years has undergone certain changes, but also retained common features.