1600 by 1200 what format. Screen resolution, aspect ratio and their letter abbreviations. What to consider when choosing a monitor resolution

When purchasing a new monitor for your system unit, consultants at any electronics store may ask you what screen resolution you prefer for the monitor. For those to whom such a question may seem like something from the Chinese literacy section, let’s break it down. So.

What is screen resolution?

Let's start with what the image that we see on the monitor is. Any picture is assembled from special points - pixels. To somehow understand what we are talking about, let’s draw an analogy with embroidery. From monotonous crosses of different colors, the result is some kind of picture or pattern. So here, pixels are like crosses on embroidery, only they are much smaller and tightly pressed against each other, so there is no feeling that the image consists of individual dots, but looks whole. In addition, they are able to take on different colors as required by the situation. Thanks to this, we watch movies, pictures, switch different windows and instantly see the corresponding changes on the monitor.

Pixels - nowhere without them

Pixels can be square or in some cases rectangular. There was even a wave of replacement of the beloved square monitors with more elongated ones, which sometimes stretched the images too much. But more on that later.

It is the number of these same pixels per unit length, or in other words their density, that determines the resolution of monitor screens.

Screen Resolution Options

The main parameters of monitor resolution are height and width. So, if you go to the control panel on your computer and go to the screen settings section, you can go to this window (this particular window is for users of the Windows 7 operating system), which you will see in the photo below.

In this case, the monitor has a maximum resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels. What does it mean? This means that the width from the left to the right sides of the monitor is 1366 pixels, and from top to bottom - 768. This is the optimal monitor, given as an example, in which information from the screen will be transmitted as clearly and conveniently as possible for a person with normal, normal vision .

We also see that the monitor can be set to another, lower resolution. By reducing the width to 1024 pixels, for example, images can be made to appear more stretched. That is, in fact, the physical number of pixels that determines the resolution of the monitor screen does not change, it remains the same, but the display of images will be the same as it would be with a different resolution.

The most popular screen formats

The shape of pixels was mentioned above, so let’s look at this issue in more detail.

Previously, and we are talking about a hundred years since the appearance of the first films, all monitors of the first models of televisions and computers had a 4:3 format. Even when there were no televisions yet, silent films were shot in this format. What do these numbers mean? This is the aspect ratio of the display element, one might say the ratios of the height and width of the monitor. So, the dimensions can be as follows: 16:12 = 4x4:3x4, 40:30 = 4x10:3x10. Analogue TVs for the most part have this particular format and, accordingly, analogue TV shows are also “fitted” to fit the 4:3 frame. This also includes the 5:4 format. It is also more “square”, and is used in the production of computer monitors. But gradually the new 16:9 format burst into life, which gave rise to a new image size, and the screen resolution of a wide-format monitor appeared, constantly being modernized and changing in parameters.

Widescreen broadcasting: convenient or profitable?

The new trend was advertised for its convenience. So, a person should perceive information better on the sides of the monitor than on the top and bottom. But we must not miss the point that large-format production is possible. Yes, yes, if you take 4:3 and 16:9 monitors, which have equal diagonals, it turns out that their area is different. A 4:3 screen will have more room to work with than a 16:9 screen, but will require fewer production resources than a square one. Many opinions have been expressed both for and against widescreen monitors, and both have their pros and cons. For those people who began their acquaintance with computers in the days of the 4:3 format, wide screens are inconvenient and require a lot of time to adapt to it.

Thus, when working in office programs such as Microsoft Word at the same scale, 5:4 monitors will be able to display more lines than their widescreen counterparts. You don’t need to constantly move up and down the sheet to find some information; you can see the entire sheet, and at the same time you won’t lose much in the readability of the text. Wide monitors stretch the “square” image, causing round things to become oval, stretching the faces and bodies of characters on the screen. Fortunately, they are working on all the problems. So, on a 5:4 monitor you can view a widescreen movie, only black margins will be added at the top and bottom so as not to cut off part of the image. Similarly, on a wide monitor, you can make sure that the picture has its original parameters and does not spread across the entire screen area. In computer games, developers add the ability to support different formats, etc. But it is still important that the wide format is primarily beneficial for the manufacturer, and it is constantly being imposed on us, reducing the production of square screens. “Do you want a 5:4 monitor? But this is unfashionable, no one buys these anymore!” Of course, he doesn’t buy it, because everyone is chasing fashion, not really thinking about convenience. And the funny thing is that screens with 4:3, 5:4 formats are cheaper than models of wide-format monitors, the production of which uses less material, and which, logically, should cost less. But let's get back to the question

Problems in choosing the optimal resolution

The fact is that the abundance of manufacturers who decide for themselves which expansion is best for them puts the consumer in a difficult position. There are more than three dozen different video standards, which have different resolutions and different aspect ratios. Let's say the XGA video standard has a resolution of 1024 × 768 (786k) or 640 × 480 (307k), with an aspect ratio of 4:3, when the VGA standard has four acceptable resolutions (640 × 480, 640 × 350, 320 × 200, 720 × 400 ) with appropriate aspect ratios (4:3, 64:35, 16:10, 9:5). The WHUXGA video standard has by far the largest number of pixels at 7680×4800 (36864k) and is widescreen at 16:10. But how to choose exactly the one that will suit a particular user?

What to consider when choosing a monitor resolution

The maximum resolution of the monitor screen is often optimal for working on a computer. It can be manually changed to one of those available in the list of resolution settings.

Since the issue of screen resolution is relevant for both TVs and computers, which are fundamentally different devices (although a TV can be connected to a PC as a monitor), we will consider the optimal parameters separately for both types of devices.

TV: ease of viewing

The standard definition monopolist in its field for some time has always had an aspect ratio of 4:3, and only relatively recently has the 16:9 ratio begun to appear, which is positioned as a high-definition image - digital television. We are now exactly at the stage when the transition from one standard to another is taking place, and how long this process will drag on is completely unclear. Some countries have long switched to a new, more convenient and high-quality digital format, but in domestic spaces this can be expected for a long time. Therefore, you can buy a newfangled widescreen TV, almost all models of which provide a function for adjusting the resolution of monitor screens. After carefully studying the instructions, the user will be able to decide for himself how to view a square picture on a rectangular monitor - stretch it to fill the entire monitor, or add a black frame on the sides to preserve the proportions of the original image.

PC monitor - a dilemma for gamers

If a gamer chooses a monitor, then he must first familiarize himself with the requirements for the preferred game/games, and then, based on this data, summarize which monitor screen resolutions are best suited for this. It’s impossible to say unequivocally “this model is ideal for all games in the world.”

View news in Odnoklassniki - is it worth bothering with choosing a resolution?

If you use a PC to work in office programs or simply to view mail, news feeds on social networks, etc., you need to choose solely based on personal experience or consult with an experienced user who can explain to you all the points of interest.

This also includes the screen resolution of the laptop monitor. It is likely that for its transportation it will be more convenient (purely physically) for it to be rectangular and compact, so as to fit into a backpack or bag. On a rectangular monitor, it is convenient to open two windows at once, when a 4:3 or 5:4 monitor gives you more space to view and work on one document.

Do you need to buy a new monitor, but don’t know where to start or what to do when choosing? You need to choose the right screen resolution, because the quality of the resulting picture will largely depend on this. And this is important both when working with computer programs and when watching videos. This article will help you figure out which screen resolution is best for your monitor in your case. Let's start with everything in order.

What screen resolution is best for a monitor?

In fact, it is very difficult to choose the best screen resolution. Obviously, the choice of resolution depends on the purpose of purchasing the monitor. Games? Social media? Each purpose has its own optimal resolution. In order not to miss the choice, you need to get acquainted with the terminology.

Basic classification

Resolution - the maximum number of pixels located horizontally and vertically:

  • A display that supports resolutions below 640x480 pixels is called VGA.
  • If there are 800x600 or more points - SVGA.
  • Monitors with a resolution of 1024x768 pixels are sometimes called XGA.

Each display is characterized by resolution. Display device size and resolution are two different things. When choosing, it is best to be guided by the characteristics of the existing device.

Important! Which screen resolution is better? Each monitor has recommended settings for it, which are selected in such a way that each pixel on the display device matches the pixel in the image, which will lead to the clearest picture. The optimal “dimensions” are indicated in the technical specifications of the device.

Monitor resolutions and types

The maximum resolution of an LCD monitor is determined by the resolution of its matrix. The higher it is, the more different data can be displayed on the screen. Let's look at specific examples:

  • For LCD monitors, everything depends on the size of the matrix. Do not forget that the maximum screen resolution depends on the screen diagonal. 15-inch displays have a resolution of 1024x768 pixels. Perfect for most basic office monitors.
  • 19 and 17 inch monitors are equipped with a resolution of 1280x1024 pixels. Such monitors perform a wider range of tasks.
  • Modern monitors have higher resolution. It is 1600x1200 pixels or more.
  • Every year more and more points fit on the same diagonal. Who knows what will await us in a couple of years?

Setting the screen resolution

To adjust the device resolution, you do not need to have any special knowledge of modern technology:

  1. Open the Start menu and then go to Control Panel.
  2. In the Appearance and Personalization category, select Adjust Screen Resolution.
  3. In the “Resolution” menu you can set the values ​​you need.

Diagonal size

Screen diagonal is an important characteristic that distinguishes monitors from each other, while greatly influencing the price category. There are mainly four categories of monitors:

  1. 20 inches is the choice for the office. Budget is the main selection criterion if you are an entrepreneur.
  2. 20-24 inches. More than half of the display devices sold in 2016 belong to this category.
  3. 27 inches. Such “devices” should not be installed at the usual “working” distance, since such a diagonal will make individual pixels noticeable.
  4. 30 inches or more. They are not a mass product due to their high price and overall dimensions.

Important! The last two categories are not particularly popular and are not suitable for “standard” home use.

Occasionally you can find special systems consisting of several monitors. Such systems have their advantages, especially for gamers. But for trouble-free operation you will need a fairly powerful computer. And the market is no longer deprived of virtual reality devices, which are cheaper and have an order of magnitude higher effect and better quality.

A little about TVs

Each format has its own merits. But you need to choose a value that determines the number of points per unit area based on the existing signal source:

  • HD-Ready - screens are suitable for all types of modern television. But this format is best suited for watching DVD movies.
  • Full HD - devices with 1920x1080 parameters. Great for use with game consoles, satellite TV channels and Blue-Ray disc players

Aspect Ratio

When choosing a display, you should consider the aspect ratio. Let's talk about several of the most popular screen formats these days.

The most famous screen formats:

  • Previously, the monitors of the first computers and televisions came in a 4 to 3 format. These numbers express the aspect ratio of the display object. The vast majority of TVs have this format.
  • The ratio 5:4 is also considered popular. This format is often used in the manufacture of computer screens.
  • But a new format is gradually gaining popularity - 16:9. It is this format that is the founder of the new image size.

Benefits and convenience of a wide format

The main bet of a wide format is convenience. It is easier for the user to perceive information from the sides, rather than from the sides and below. But let's not miss all the nuances. Widescreen monitors are significantly cheaper to manufacture.

Devices of this format have both opponents and supporters:

  • Some people find it more convenient to work and relax behind a widescreen monitor.
  • Some people get tired of flipping back and forth on the page looking for the information they need and will prefer to use a 4:3 screen.

Important! For work and relaxation on social networks, 4:3 or 5:4 screens are suitable, since it will be possible to open several windows at the same time, and there will be more space for work. But let’s not forget that all this is statistics, and each user has the right to independently decide which “dimensions” it is more convenient for him to work with.

Optimal distance to monitor

For any monitor size, you need to know the correct distance to it. To determine the optimal distance to the screen, there is a universal formula - a coefficient of 1 or 1.5 must be multiplied by the diagonal.

Important! Placing the information display device at a calculated distance will help not tire your eyes when working with a computer.

Matrix types

Today, matrices are known that are manufactured according to the following principles:

  • TN matrices are inexpensive and fast. Technology based on them is relatively inexpensive and is well suited for computer games with dynamics.

Important! The disadvantage of such matrices is a small viewing angle and not the most acceptable color rendition. Such devices are definitely not suitable for professionals.

What is screen resolution, what types exist and how do they differ.

Screen resolution is one of the most important characteristics that every person should take into account when trying to buy an LCD TV from a hardware store. Resolution, which undoubtedly affects cost, is measured in pixels. The resolution designation is the ratio of the number of vertical pixels to horizontal pixels. Modern manufacturers invest huge amounts of money in the development of LCD TVs, whose screens would have the highest possible resolution.

Note that the manufacturer of the TV will not necessarily be the manufacturer of liquid crystal matrices. Different companies can purchase screens from the same manufacturing company, as a result of which we can observe the same matrices in different models.

Standardization

Of course, manufacturing companies must coordinate developments in terms of increasing the resolution of matrices. This is the only way to achieve stable operation of television broadcasting in all regions. This, in turn, allows manufacturers to sell their products in different countries. To this end, international organizations have developed specialized standards for the development of technologies for high-definition television, and these standards are mandatory for all manufacturers and developers.

Resolutions of modern TV models

Standards for high-definition television were developed by the European international organization ETSI and the American international organization ATSC. In accordance with these standards, which allow TVs based on LCD technology to be compatible with all international regions, the following resolutions of LCD TVs are distinguished:

1. 720 rub. A standard for a resolution of 1280*720 pixels, characterized by an aspect ratio of 16:9, frame rates of 50 and 60 Hz, and progressive scan.

2. 1080i. The standard is for a resolution of 1920*1080 pixels, with an aspect ratio of 16:9, interlaced scanning, and frame rates of 25 and 30 frames per second.

3. 1080r. Standard for 1920*1080 resolution with frame rates from 24 to 60 Hz, 16:9 aspect ratio and progressive scan.

Main Differences

As you understand, modern television signal decomposition standards for different countries were created in an effort to achieve maximum image quality when transmitting a signal over a distance. The main characteristics of signal decomposition are the type of frame scanning, frame frequency and number of lines.

Among the main television standards for transmitting television signals, the European standards PAL/SECAM can be particularly highlighted. In the USA the standard is NTSC. The European standard provides 625 lines, and the American standard provides 100 lines less. It is necessary to take into account that the standards were developed even when the first CRT televisions for mass consumption appeared. For example, on CRT TVs, all 625 lines of the resulting image are not used. In a system of deflecting coils, it is necessary to provide not only the time during which the beam travels to the source, but also the reverse time of the beam's movement, so the visible frame is actually formed from only 576 lines. This fact formed the basis of the standardized resolution for digital television, whose value is 720 * 576.

If we talk about the frame rate, then for old television receivers it was determined by the frequency of the current in the electrical network of a certain region. So, in America the frequency of the current was 60 Hz, while in Europe it was 50 Hz. This fact greatly facilitated the work on creating television scan generators.

Despite the fact that the standards were developed a long time ago, they are still adhered to today, since new TVs must be compatible with older models. For digital television receivers, that is, for LCD and plasma televisions, no restrictions are required, which is explained by certain design features. Thus, the new HDTV standard, developed for high-definition television, is based exclusively on digital transmission of television signals. To create service pulses, it does not need to use lines, as a result of which the number of lines in the name of the standard determines the number of lines forming the image. The HDTV standard can be generated with 720 or 1080 lines, with progressive or interlaced scanning and frame rates of 50 and 60 Hz.

Standards are indicated by an entry that specifies the number of signal lines, interlaced (i) or progressive (p) scanning, as well as the frame rate, which can be written separated by a slash.

Interlace scanning - preliminary updating of even lines with subsequent updating of odd lines in another half-frame. Progressive scan – recording all lines of an image on one screen simultaneously. As you can imagine, progressive scan produces higher quality images.

The following types of television signal decomposition are distinguished, which have been used since the beginning of the development of modern television:

1. Low-definition television LDTV, standard 240p and 288p;
2. Standard definition television SDTV, standard 576i for PAL and 480i for NTSC;
3. High definition television EDTV, standards 480p, 576p and 720p;
4. High-definition television HDTV, 1080i and 1080p standards;
5. Ultra high definition television UHDTV, standard 4320p.

Add a comment (possible with photo)

Currently you have JavaScript disabled. In order to post comments, please make sure JavaScript and Cookies are enabled, and reload the page. on how to enable JavaScript in your browser.

You can add your photo (jpg)

  • What diagonal is it better to buy a TV for an apartment, existing sizes.

  • How to use a multicooker, cooking according to instructions.

  • What types of backlighting are there for an LCD (LED) TV screen?

  • What's new in Sony TVs, technologies, prices for models.

Question from a user

Hello.

I had an error with the image... One game was launched, for some reason the error suddenly appeared: "... that the AMD video driver was stopped due to...", and then I noticed that everything on the monitor screen became large .

Also, if earlier I could place a hundred shortcuts on the desktop, now there are already 10 - and almost half of the space is gone! How so, what needs to be done to return everything to its previous state?

Anatoly.

Good time everyone!

This happens due to the fact that the optimal screen resolution (in your case, the video driver may have crashed, and because of this the resolution has gone down).

In general, if explained in simple words, then screen resolution- this is the number of points along which the picture is built on the monitor. Of course, the more dots, the clearer and more accurate the contours of the image.

Each monitor has its own optimal resolution, which, in most cases, is worth choosing (if you set the resolution higher than the recommended one, then the text and some elements will become too small and difficult to read, if less than the recommended one, everything on the screen will become large, like from the author of the question).

So, let's get down to business...

Ratio to screen diagonal

In general, as I said above, each monitor has its own optimal resolution, which (usually) is what Windows sets by default (at least if you have all the necessary drivers installed). In some cases this doesn't happen...

Permission is related to monitor diagonal . The larger the diagonal, the higher the resolution, as a rule. If anyone doesn’t know, the diagonal is measured in inches (1 inch = 2.53 cm).

What is diagonal and how is it measured (1 inch = 2.53 cm)

Just below I have given a table that relates the diagonal of the monitor and its resolution (please note that the numbers are relative (although this is most often the case), because each manufacturer sets its own parameters).

Diagonal Permission Designation Format (aspect ratio)
15.0 1024x768 XGA 4:3
15.6 (laptop) 1366x768 HD 16:9
17.0 1280x1024 SXGA 5:4
17.0 1440x900 WXGA+ 16:10
17.3

(laptop)

1600:900 or Full HD 16:9
19.0 1280x1024 SXGA 5:4
19.0 1440x900 WXGA+ 16:10
20.1 1400x1050 SXGA+ 4:3
20.1 1680x1050 WSXGA+ 16:10
20.1 1600x1200 UXGA 4:3
20.8 2048x1536 QXGA 4:3
21.0 1680x1050 WSXGA+ 16:10
21.3 1600x1200 UXGA 4:3
22.0 1680x1050 WSXGA+ 16:10
22.2 3840x2400 WQUXGA 16:10
23.0 1920x1200 WUXGA 16:10
24.0 1920x1200 WUXGA 16:10
26.0 1920x1200 WUXGA 16:10
27.0 1920x1200 WUXGA 16:10
30.0 2560x1600 WQXGA+ 16:10

Also, monitors can have different aspect ratios (square-shaped, elongated rectangular, etc.). The table below just links the resolution to the aspect ratio.

Setting the optimal resolution

By the way, to find out the current monitor resolution, you can use online services:

Important!

If you do not have video driver icons in the tray, on the desktop, or in the Windows Control Panel, you most likely do not have video drivers.

Also, if they are not there, you will not be able to change the resolution (there will simply not be an optimal option in the list). Until you install new drivers (or update the “old ones”), the problem cannot be fixed.

I have a detailed article on updating video adapter drivers on my blog, I recommend you read it:

In the IntelHD video driver (nVidia, AMD)

This is one of the easiest ways to quickly change many screen parameters: resolution, brightness, contrast, color gamut, refresh rate, etc.

If you have a video driver installed, then you just need to use the tray icon next to the clock (or right-click anywhere on the desktop). In my case it is IntelHD, in yours it may also be AMD (Ati Radeon) or nVidia (GeForce).

In the settings, as a rule, you need to open the main parameters section (in IntelHD this is “Basic Settings”. In general, many parameters and menu variations depend on the version of your video driver: it is unrealistic to provide all possible options in the article ☺).

You need to alternately change the resolution - choose the one that is most convenient and comfortable for work. Focus first on what is recommended. If the elements on the screen are too small, try moving the resolution down 1-2 points, making it a little smaller.

On Windows 7

If you have Windows 7, then you just need to right-click on any free space on the desktop, and select “Screen Resolution” in the menu that appears, see the screenshot below.

Next, in the “Resolution” tab, you can see what you currently have selected and what else you can set. The optimal resolution is usually marked as “Recommended” (see screenshot below). Most often, they choose either the best option or 1-2 points lower (so that the picture and text on the screen are larger, important for monitors with a large diagonal).

Screen customization in Windows 7

On Windows 8/10

Press a combination of buttons Win+R, then enter the command desk.cpl and press Enter. See screenshot below.

Next, the “Screen” section will open and you can change many parameters: brightness, text (font) size, resolution, etc. Open additional settings, see what resolutions you can set (see example below).

By the way, if you don’t have such a list, and the optimal resolution is not indicated at all, most likely (as I said above) you simply don’t have a video driver. Try updating it (I provided the link to the article above).

Important!

If you have an old CRT monitor (these are so thick ☺, there are few of them now, but they are used in some places) - be sure to check sweep frequency (measured in Hz).

This parameter should not be less than 85 Hz (at 60 Hz, the flickering of the monitor is very noticeable, which causes discomfort and). It's even better if you set it to 100 Hz.

Screen resolution is a very important characteristic of a TV. Manufacturers are investing a lot of money in developing high-resolution screens. Such developments are expensive and not all TV manufacturers are also manufacturers of LCD matrices. Many of them buy screens from companies that have been producing LCD matrices for a long time, and then use them in their TVs.

Screen resolution is measured in pixels and denoted as the ratio of the number of horizontal pixels to the number of vertical pixels.

For normal operation of television broadcasting in different regions and, accordingly, the ability to sell their televisions in different countries, manufacturing companies are required to coordinate their developments in the field of increasing screen resolution. Therefore, international organizations have agreed on various developments in the field of high-definition television, and today there are several standards that everyone adheres to.

Resolution Formats

Today, international organizations, such as the American ATSC and the European ETSI, have defined standards for the distribution of high-definition television. And TV manufacturers have introduced these standards into television receivers for compatibility with all regions. Currently the main standards are:

  1. 1) 720r. Resolution 1280x720 pixels, progressive scanning, frame rate can be 50 or 60 Hz, frame format 16:9.
  2. 2) 1080i. Resolution 1920x1080 pixels, interlaced scanning, frame format 16:9, frequency 50 or 60 half-frames per second, which corresponds to 25 or 30 frames.
  3. 3) 1080p. Resolution 1920x1080 pixels (2.07 MP), interline scan, frame format 16:9, frame rate 24, 25, 30, 50, 60 Hz.
  4. 4) 2160p. Resolution 3840x2160 pixels (8.8 MP).

Difference in standards

The desire to obtain the highest quality signal on a TV when transmitted over a distance has led to the emergence of different standards for TV signal decomposition in different countries. The main characteristics of signal decomposition are the number of lines, frame rate and type of vertical scanning.


The main standards for transmitting television signals are European PAL and SECAM, as well as the American NTSC system. European systems use 625 lines, and American systems use 525 lines. These standards were invented at the beginning of the era of CRT televisions, and this fact must be taken into account. For example, the number of lines 625 is not fully used to form an image on a kinescope screen. Indeed, in the system of deflection coils it is necessary to provide time for the reverse movement of the beam, and therefore only 576 lines were actually used to form a visible frame. It is this number that is shown in the digital television screen resolution of 720x576.

The frame rate in old TVs was selected depending on the frequency of the current in the power supply network. For Europe 50 Hz, and for America 60 Hz. With this choice, it is easier to build TV scan generators.

All these restrictions on decomposition standards still exist today, because we have to implement compatibility between old and new TVs. But for digital devices (LCD and OLED) such restrictions are not necessary due to their design features. And the new high-definition television standard HDTV uses only digital signal transmission and does not need to use lines for service pulses, therefore, the number of lines indicated in the name of the standard is the same that forms the picture on the screen. This signal decomposition standard contains 720 or 1080 lines, a frame rate of 50 or 60 Hz, and the scan type can be interlaced or progressive.

When designating a standard, a notation is used that indicates the number of lines of the signal, the type of scan is progressive (“p”) or interlaced (“i”), and the frame rate can be indicated through a slash. Progressive scanning means that all the lines of the image are written to the screen at the same time, and interlaced scanning means that the even lines are updated first and the odd lines are updated in another half-frame. Progressive scan is better and is what is mostly used today.


Throughout the development of television, the following types of television signal decomposition have been used:

  • LDTV – low definition television (240p, 288p);
  • SDTV - standard definition television (480i - NTSC, 576i - PAL);
  • EDTV – high definition television (480p, 576p, 720p);
  • HDTV – high definition television (1080i, 1080p);
  • 4K UHDTV – ultra high definition television (2160p).
  • 8K UHDTV – ultra high definition television (4320p).

The beginning of high definition television

Developments in the field of increasing the resolution of television pictures appeared with the introduction of electronic signal processing methods. And this happened back in the 30s of the last century. Then they abandoned mechanical scanning, and it became possible to increase the number of lines on the screen. But on an industrial scale, the development of high-definition television (HDTV) began with the introduction of large-format cinema.

This happened in the 1950s, when television was developing at a rapid pace and, fearing competition, the film industry switched to wide-format films to protect itself, because they were more convenient to watch in the cinema. Such films were poorly displayed on simple kinescope television screens, and then television manufacturers began to develop high-definition television, which could perfectly transmit wide format to television screens.

But at that time, development stopped due to the need to use CRT screens with a large diagonal. The production of such displays for the mass consumer was not economically profitable. And only with the development of liquid crystal and plasma screen technology in 2000, the practical application of developments in the field of high-definition television (HDTV) became possible.

To implement HDTV, transmitters and receivers were developed, high-resolution screens were created, HD DVD and Blu-Ray media, HDMI and DVI-D data transfer interfaces were developed. According to the standard adopted in Russia, high-definition television includes 16:9 widescreen image signals with a resolution of 1920x1080. If the frame has a 4:3 ratio, then the resolution will be 1536x1152 pixels. This is how the HDTV standard came into being.